Hacia una nueva lógica del populismo: de la ruptura de las instituciones a la institucionalidad rupturista

Cadahia, María Luciana; Coronel, Valeria; Guanche, Julio César; Stoessel, Soledad

doi:10.6035/recerca.2020.25.1.3

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Not all scholars accept the inevitability of this negative relationship between populism and democracy. A group of scholars perhaps best characterized as neo-Laclauians (Coronel and Cadahia 2018;Ramírez Gallegos and Stoessel 2018;Cadahia et al 2020) recognize that Laclau's notion of populism fails to address how to institutionalize, within the state, the people's democratic eruption against elites that occurs in civil society. They ask if there is some institutional arrangement that can reconcile populism with a participatory form of democracy and genuine popular sovereignty.…”

Section: Populism Versus Participatory Democracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Buen Vivir under Correa: The Rhetoric of Participatory Democracy, the Reality of Rentier Populism

Posner

2022

Lat. Am. res. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article seeks to understand the relationship between populism and participatory democracy through analysis of Rafael Correa’s left populist regime in Ecuador (2007–2017). It argues that rather than adhering to its own standard for participatory democracy, what the Correa regime referred to as the “Socialism of Buen Vivir,” it employed the rhetoric of participatory democracy in the service of populist rule. As a result, the Correa regime failed to promote the participatory form of democracy and citizenship promised in Buen Vivir, its version of twenty-first-century socialism. Accordingly, analysis of the Correa regime demonstrates how the concentration of top-down executive power characteristic of populism in general, and rentier populism in particular, impedes the egalitarian and solidaristic mission of participatory democracy. Thus, inductive analysis of the Correa regime reinforces the conceptual understanding that populism is antagonistic and antithetical to participatory democracy.

show abstract

Section: Populism Versus Participatory Democracymentioning

confidence: 99%

Buen Vivir under Correa: The Rhetoric of Participatory Democracy, the Reality of Rentier Populism

Posner

2022

Lat. Am. res. rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En palabras de Parekh: una praxis de emancipación popular. Véase Vergara (2020) o Cadahia et al (2020).…”

Section: Discursos Del Odiounclassified

Populismo y discursos del odio: un matrimonio evitable (en teoría)

Pariente

2022

Isegoría

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Este trabajo aborda la relación entre el populismo y los discursos del odio. Tomando como referencia la visión favorable del populismo teorizada por Laclau y Mouffe, desarrollaré un concepto de discurso populista formado por tres subtipos de discurso: el agonista, el solidario y el movilizador. Tras contrastar este concepto con el de discurso del odio, concluyo que ambos son independientes y que por tanto el populismo no necesita recurrir a discursos del odio, al menos en teoría. Sin embargo, advierto, la naturaleza del populismo le hace propenso a caer en ese tipo de discursos, lo cual sugiere que la praxis populista difícilmente podrá evitarlos. Dada la inmoralidad del discurso del odio, esta afinidad ofrece una razón pro tanto para abstenerse de prácticas populistas.

show abstract

“…1] For many Latin-Americanists, focusing on populism and crisis reflects a pervasive European bias in populism studies and deflects the attention away from populism as a specific institution-building phenomenon and as the political "normality" in certain contexts (Aboy Carlés 2010; Cadahia & al. 2020;Aslanidis 2017).…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Beyond the Wave, the Sea: Re-assessing the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Southern Europe's Populist Upsurge

Borriello

2021

krisis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper re-assesses the relation between the economic crisis and the rise of populist parties in the South of Europe. It argues that the former did not cause the latter directly, but rather played out as a catalyst of previously existing trends, i.e. the erosion of party democracy and the disintermediation of Western societies. It combines several theoretical approaches to advance an explanatory model that replaces the relation between crisis and populism – conceived of as political, performative and discursively mediated – within its structural pre-conditions. By doing so, it aims at providing a synthetic and steady explanation of the contemporary rise of populism in Southern Europe and beyond.

show abstract

Hacia una nueva lógica del populismo: de la ruptura de las instituciones a la institucionalidad rupturista

Cited by 4 publications

References 4 publications

Buen Vivir under Correa: The Rhetoric of Participatory Democracy, the Reality of Rentier Populism

Buen Vivir under Correa: The Rhetoric of Participatory Democracy, the Reality of Rentier Populism

Populismo y discursos del odio: un matrimonio evitable (en teoría)

Beyond the Wave, the Sea: Re-assessing the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Southern Europe's Populist Upsurge

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About