1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf03009539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Haemodynamic changes and circulating histamine concentrations following protamine administration to patients and dogs

Abstract: Haemodynamic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
3

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the rate of protamine administration did not have a significant effect on the amount of protamine delivered before a reaction occurred; however, there were significantly fewer protamine reactions in the CS group compared with all other groups. In 1 study in dogs, adverse protamine reactions did not occur when protamine was delivered over 5 minutes compared with an intravenous bolus 40 . This contrasts with our study in which significant protamine reactions occurred in both the fast group (10 mg/min) and the slow group (5 mg/min).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the rate of protamine administration did not have a significant effect on the amount of protamine delivered before a reaction occurred; however, there were significantly fewer protamine reactions in the CS group compared with all other groups. In 1 study in dogs, adverse protamine reactions did not occur when protamine was delivered over 5 minutes compared with an intravenous bolus 40 . This contrasts with our study in which significant protamine reactions occurred in both the fast group (10 mg/min) and the slow group (5 mg/min).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…In 1 study in dogs, adverse protamine reactions did not occur when protamine was delivered over 5 minutes compared with an intravenous bolus. 40 This contrasts with our study in which significant protamine reactions occurred in both the fast group (10 mg/min) and the slow group (5 mg/min). An important difference of this study compared with the study by Stoelting et al 40 is that the dogs in the latter study were not heparinized before protamine administration.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Patients given H1-and H2-receptor blockers prior to protamine administration suffered less adverse hemodynamic effects than patients without histamine blockers [38]. Plasma histamine increases induced by protamine may depend both on the route and speed of drug administration [39,40]. We did not find increased histamine levels 5 min after protamine infusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…12). The situation with protamine is less clear than with heparin since a variety of mechanisms have been proposed for even the fatal reactions to protamine: complement activation, kallikrein-kinin system activation, formation of thromboxane A2 , anaphylactic response due to specific IgE antibodies and non-immunological histamine release (STOELTING et al 1984;WESTABY et al 1985;HORROW 1985a,b;SHARATH et al 1985;COLMAN 1987;MOREL et al 1987). The main problem again seems to be interpretation of the data.…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…If histamine release is only a contributory determinant in protamine reactions then the analysis of individual cases and the calculation of conditional probabilities [P (AR HR) > P(AR HR)] is necessary. This has been performed by individual analysis in the article of MOREL et al (1987), but not in that of STOELTING et al (1984). Individual case analysis favours histamine release as an important chemical factor in patients with considerably peripheral vasodilatation, but not with acute pulmonal hypertension (MOREL et al 1987).…”
Section: Surgical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%