2015
DOI: 10.1051/cocv/2014054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hamilton–Jacobi equations for optimal control on junctions and networks

Abstract: Abstract. We consider continuous-state and continuous-time control problems where the admissible trajectories of the system are constrained to remain on a network. A notion of viscosity solution of Hamilton-Jacobi equations on the network has been proposed in earlier articles. Here, we propose a simple proof of a comparison principle based on arguments from the theory of optimal control. We also discuss stability of viscosity solutions.Résumé. On considère des problèmes de contrôle optimal pour lesquels l'état… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On another hand, several papers have been devoted to the case of control problems on networks [25,2,26], where the framework is also different from the one considered in Corrollary 2.1. Indeed, in the above cited papers, the dynamics is defined only on each branch and is not Lipschitz continuous in the whole network.…”
Section: Discussion and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On another hand, several papers have been devoted to the case of control problems on networks [25,2,26], where the framework is also different from the one considered in Corrollary 2.1. Indeed, in the above cited papers, the dynamics is defined only on each branch and is not Lipschitz continuous in the whole network.…”
Section: Discussion and Commentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then u ε converges uniformly to u in L ∞ (P i , R) and there exists a function m : (0, +∞) → (0, +∞) such that lim ε→0 m(ε) = 0 and the function u ε −m(ε) is a viscosity subsolution of (3.27) on a neighborhood of Γ. [3] is adopted to prove Lemma 6.2 and finally, the existence of a function m : (0, +∞) → (0, +∞) with m(0 + ) = 0 such that u ε i − m(ε) is a subsolution of (3.27) on a neighborhood of Γ was proved by Lions [20] or Barles & Jakobsen [10].…”
Section: A Second Proof Of Theorem 316mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Section 3, we study the control problem under the strong controllability condition, where we derive the system of HJ equations associated with the optimal control problem, propose a comparison principle, which leads to the well-posedness of (1.1)-(1. 3), and prove that the value function of the optimal control problem is the unique discontinuous solution of the HJ system. We suggest two different proofs of the comparison principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Proof. We are going to use the notations in (2). We also recall that the stateconstraint problem in branch i is the optimal control problem restricted to the branch i and such that, at the point x = 0 we can only use controls that make us to not leave the branch.…”
Section: A Twofold Junction Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%