2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jde.2014.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Infinite horizon problems on stratifiable state-constraints sets

Abstract: This paper deals with a state-constrained control problem. It is well known that, unless some compatibility condition between constraints and dynamics holds, the value function has not enough regularity, or can fail to be the unique constrained viscosity solution of a HamiltonJacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation. Here, we consider the case of a set of constraints having a stratified structure. Under this circumstance, the interior of this set may be empty or disconnected, and the admissible trajectories may have the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A rich literature has been developed for dealing with state constrained optimal control problems and the associated HJB equations. In the deterministic setting, we refer to [34,35,19,22,14,21] where the HJB equation for the value function is discussed and several conditions are investigated in order to guarantee the characterization of ϑ. In the stochastic case, the problem has also attracted a great attention, see for example [24,26,23,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A rich literature has been developed for dealing with state constrained optimal control problems and the associated HJB equations. In the deterministic setting, we refer to [34,35,19,22,14,21] where the HJB equation for the value function is discussed and several conditions are investigated in order to guarantee the characterization of ϑ. In the stochastic case, the problem has also attracted a great attention, see for example [24,26,23,10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. The implication (iii) ⇒ (i) is customary and well known, in particular see [20], Proposition 5.1 in the constrained framework and [18], [19], [15], [28] for the unconstrained framework. Now we prove that (i)⇒ (ii).…”
Section: Supersolutions and Super-optimalitymentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The first proposition states the existence of smooth trajectories for a given initial data, namely, initial point and initial velocity. The proof is analogous to the proof of Proposition 4.1 of [20] and we omit it. Lemma B.1.…”
Section: B1 Some Background In Non Smooth Analysis: Trajectories Andmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We do not know whether these results apply to the ramified sets for which interfaces of dimension d − 2 cross each other (see Figure 1b). Recent results on optimal control and HJ equations on ramified sets include Bressan & Hong [11], Camilli, Schieborn & Marchi [13], Nakayasu [24] and Hermosilla & Zidani [17] and the book of Barles & Chasseigne [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%