13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2010.5625279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hand-eye autocalibration of camera positions on vehicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by the change in height and orientation with respect to the ground plane during turns. Ruland et al [15] also observed a strong dependency between errors in camera height and estimation errors. Both approaches appear to be very sensitive to nonplanarities, as can be seen in the last row in both tables respectively.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This can be explained by the change in height and orientation with respect to the ground plane during turns. Ruland et al [15] also observed a strong dependency between errors in camera height and estimation errors. Both approaches appear to be very sensitive to nonplanarities, as can be seen in the last row in both tables respectively.…”
Section: Quantitative Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Hence, the decoupled estimation of the relative orientation, such as in [6], based on rotations only, is not possible. The work of Ruland et al [15] is dedicated to this case. They use the Ackermann steering model and given motion parameters to estimate the 2D position of a camera with respect to the vehicle coordinate frame.…”
Section: Introduction and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Approaches for automotive camera self-calibration are either aiming at intrinsic calibration (Houben, 2014), (Keivan and Sibley, 2015) , i.e. estimating the interior orientation and distortion parameters of the cameras, at extrinsic calibration (Ruland et al, 2010), (Heng et al, 2014), i.e. estimating the parameters of the exterior orientation, or at both (Heng et al, 2013).…”
Section: Automotive Camera Self-calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, approaches relying on image features detected by descriptors like SIFT (Dang et al, 2009) or SURF (Heng et al, 2014) are typically not subject to the aforementioned constraints. Though, robustness might be hard to achieve by a SfM method for camera self-calibration due to problems with correspondence search in road scene images, as reported by (Ruland et al, 2010) for the cases of poor illumination or poor road textures. Additionally it has been reported that moving cars or pedestrians could have negative influence on camera calibration, wherefore some methods include special outlier removal steps to make calibration more robust, like (Dang et al, 2009).…”
Section: Automotive Camera Self-calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intrinsic camera parameters include focal length and pixel size, while extrinsic parameters describe camera position and rotation relative to the vehicle body. Both can be obtained by either manual calibration using a predefined calibration pattern or automatically by means of online calibration algorithms [24].…”
Section: A System Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%