2008 IEEE International Conference on Communications 2008
DOI: 10.1109/icc.2008.1092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handover Latency Analysis of a Network-Based Localized Mobility Management Protocol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For our numerical analysis, the following transmission de RetransT imer and DADT ransmits are set as 1000 ms and 1, respectively [15]. Figure 5 presents each type of handover latency.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For our numerical analysis, the following transmission de RetransT imer and DADT ransmits are set as 1000 ms and 1, respectively [15]. Figure 5 presents each type of handover latency.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented in [15], the mean time between unsolicited RtAdv messages sent from the AR can be expressed as (MinInt + MaxInt)/2, where MinInt and MaxInt are the minimum and maximum times allowed between sending unsolicited RtAdv messages, respectively, as defined in [1], [16]. D (KP) MD is thus expressed as the half of the mean time between unsolicited RtAdv messages:…”
Section: (Kp)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signaling flow diagrams are shown by considering the signaling overhead during the handover interruption time, which means by excluding the signaling not involved in handover interruption time. The network model of [6] is considered for handover latency analysis of mobility management protocols. The acronyms used are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Mobility Management Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible to act at the application layer through increased protection against packet loss and delay. If the handover can be anticipated then prebuffering [8] at the client is possible. In [8], it is noted that, receiver notification of increased packet losses and roundtrip times are insufficient handover indicators, because they occur after the event.…”
Section: Handover Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the handover can be anticipated then prebuffering [8] at the client is possible. In [8], it is noted that, receiver notification of increased packet losses and roundtrip times are insufficient handover indicators, because they occur after the event. Instead, in [9] information about an impending handover is passed up the protocol layers.…”
Section: Handover Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%