Ninth International Workshop on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition
DOI: 10.1109/iwfhr.2004.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Handwritten Brazilian Month Recognition: An Analysis of Two NN Architectures and a Rejection Mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[12]. Many researchers have used the Hidden-Markov Model (HMM), Neural-Networks (NN) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), which provides accuracy, but involve lot of complexity [13,14]. The method applied in our experiment does not involve the complex structures used in previous work.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12]. Many researchers have used the Hidden-Markov Model (HMM), Neural-Networks (NN) and Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLP), which provides accuracy, but involve lot of complexity [13,14]. The method applied in our experiment does not involve the complex structures used in previous work.…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ANNs (artificial neural networks) and HMMs (hidden markov models) are the most used, amongst the techniques which have been investigated for handwriting recognition. It has been observed that ANNs in general obtained best results than HMMs [11]. The most widely studied and used artificial neural network is the MLP (multi-layer perceptron) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature we can find a wide diversity of VSs for HWR. On the one hand are the VSs directly applying a rejection rule to the HWR hypotheses scores [8,7,10]. For HWR based on Hidden Markov Models (HMMs), which is by far the most successfully employed statistical approach according to the state-of-theart, VS rejection mechanisms rely usually on the same HMM decoding scores.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%