1998
DOI: 10.1109/43.703833
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hardware-optimal test register insertion

Abstract: Implementing a built-in self-test by a "test per clock" scheme offers advantages concerning fault coverage, detection of delay faults, and test application time. Such a scheme is implemented by test registers, for instance built-in logic block observers (BILBO's) and concurrent BILBO's (CBILBO's), which are inserted into the circuit structure at appropriate places. An algorithm is presented which is able to find the cost optimal placement of test registers for nearly all the ISCAS'89 sequential benchmark circu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 as a conventional technique and the proposed method (single-control testable design for testability method) will be compared for the hardware overhead after design for testability and the fault detection rate. The RTL benchmark circuits used in the experiments are GCD and Paulin [9], 3rd Lattice Wave Filter (LWF), and 4th IIR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 as a conventional technique and the proposed method (single-control testable design for testability method) will be compared for the hardware overhead after design for testability and the fault detection rate. The RTL benchmark circuits used in the experiments are GCD and Paulin [9], 3rd Lattice Wave Filter (LWF), and 4th IIR.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 has reported a design for testability method in which the design is changed in such a way that all closed circuits inside the circuit contain two BILBOs or one CBILBO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the gate level, the module under test is subjected to error simulations to evaluate error detection rates. The SC and CSC methods have high error-detection rates, and compared to the method proposed by Stoele and Wunderlich [2], have low hardware overhead. Under the SC method, the test is combined with each module individually, which results in long testing times; the CSC method can be combined with multiple modules simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Test-per-clock has short test-execution times, and can be used for delayed errors, which must extend a test pattern over consecutive cycles. Stoele and Wunderlich [2] proposed Design for Testability (DFT), specifically BILBO [3], which requires at least two closed circuits to be present, and CBILBO [4], which requires one. The problem with this approach is high hardware overhead.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [2] even gives an algorithm to compute the optimum solutions for breaking loops. Later on, breaking loops method was also adapted to BIST [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%