2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00373-017-1784-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Harmonic Index Designs in Binary Hamming Schemes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; ng, and thus it is always smaller than or equal to one of [18]. Therefore the Fisher type lower bound in this paper improves the bound of [18]. Further, due to their definition of C n;t , they argued only in the case when t is even, but since we consider the minimum of K t ðsÞ only on the finite set (which always exists), one can also argue in the case when t is odd.…”
Section: Now Let Us Give a Fisher Type Lower Bound For An Himentioning
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…; ng, and thus it is always smaller than or equal to one of [18]. Therefore the Fisher type lower bound in this paper improves the bound of [18]. Further, due to their definition of C n;t , they argued only in the case when t is even, but since we consider the minimum of K t ðsÞ only on the finite set (which always exists), one can also argue in the case when t is odd.…”
Section: Now Let Us Give a Fisher Type Lower Bound For An Himentioning
confidence: 63%
“…. ; ng, and thus it is always smaller than or equal to one of [18]. Therefore the Fisher type lower bound in this paper improves the bound of [18].…”
Section: Now Let Us Give a Fisher Type Lower Bound For An Himentioning
confidence: 68%
See 3 more Smart Citations