Hazy Days: Forest Fires and the Politics of Environmental Security in Indonesia

Abstract

The Indonesian “haze” that engulfs Southeast Asia is a result of the burning of forests and has a detrimental effect on the health of millions of people. Indonesia is currently the third largest emitter of carbon dioxide in the world. In response to the dangers posed by forest fires to national and global environmental security, the then Indonesian president publicly declared a “war on haze” in 2006 and called for the use of all necessary measures to stop the deliberate setting of fires. Although his strong “securitising” rhetoric received much public support, it is yet to produce results. The Indonesian authorities have had little success in preventing fires or prosecuting the culprits. Indonesia thus appears to be a null case – that is, a case of an unsuccessful securitisation. We argue that this unsuccessful securitisation needs to be understood against the backdrop of Indonesia's vast decentralisation process, which resulted in certain powers being devolved from Jakarta to the provinces. We find that it is the ability of local and regional elites (often entrenched in patronage networks with plantation owners) to curtail environmental policies which explains the continuation of forest fires. With regard to securitisation theory, our findings suggest that securitising moves and audience acceptance do not necessarily lead to the successful implementation of emergency measures. It appears that there are intermediate factors – in our case mainly linked to the nature of and the distribution of power within the political regime – that impact on the success of securitisation processes.

Indonesia's Forest Fire and Haze Pollution: An Analysis of Human Security

“…Edwards elaborates the influence of securitisation efforts to haze pollution, and problems in decision-making process. In his research (Edwards, 2015) he explains that Indonesia's declaration on "war on haze"framed as threats to Indonesia's populationis part of Indonesia's attempts to securitise the impact of haze on health of the population in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore. Environmental awareness had risen in the last decade based on the data of the survey.…”

The politics of local government environmental evaluations: Assessing bureaucracy in post-Reformasi Indonesia

“…Environmental governance is a field where the politics of bureaucracy can be clearly seen, yet the studies revealing this are still not many. Environment is a contentious issue (Marantz & Ulibarri, 2019), moreover if it is related to natural resource (Edwards & Heiduk, 2015, Delabre & Okereke, 2019. It is contentious because it is prone to tension or conflict, sometimes it involves repression, and displacement, and its governance tends to be interest-based and elite-biased (Van Der Heijden, 2002).…”

From Stockholm to Rio: Critical Reading of Global Environmental Governance

“…There will be some states force other states imposing certain environmental standards that are incommensurable. Armed conflict and war are possible due to securitization of environmental issues (Allenby 2000, Flyod 2008, Edwards and Heiduk 2015. Another scenario is to create bigger authority beyond states to effectively established global environmental rules.…”