“…Thus, to avoid these sources of bias, the rural zones in the northern part of the country, where an increased level of arsenic excretion had been observed, were retained for further analysis. It is noteworthy that in the populations of municipalities representative of areas A, B, and C the mean a A Area close to zinc smelters having received drinking water containing between 20 and 50 lg As/l until 1990; B area away from the smelters, drinking water with up to 20 lg As/l; C area moderately in¯uenced by zinc smelters and with less than 5 lg As/l of drinking water urinary excretion of arsenic amounted to 35, 11, and 12 lg As/24 h, respectively, and in area A the distance to the nearest smelter remained independently correlated with the urinary arsenic excretion after adjustments for covariates (e.g., sex, age, and, in men, intake of diuretics) [10]. An analysis of the data focusing on areas A, B, and C (with their grouped districts serving as the reference) showed a signi®cantly decreased prevalence of lung cancer in men living in area B.…”