Health-promoting factors among students in higher education within health care and social work: a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data in a multicentre longitudinal study

Abstract

Background Educational environments are considered important in strengthening students’ health status and knowledge, which are associated with good educational outcomes. It has been suggested to establish healthy universities based on a salutogenic approach – namely, health promotion. The aim of this study was to describe health-promoting resources and factors among first-semester students in higher education in healthcare and social work. Methods This cross-sectional study is based on a survey distributed among all students in seven healthcare and social work programmes at six universities in southern Sweden. The survey was carried out in 2018 using a self-reported, web-based questionnaire focussing on general health and well-being, lifestyle factors together with three validated instruments measuring health-promoting factors and processes: the Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale, Salutogenic Health Indicator Scale (SHIS) and Occupational Balance Questionnaire (OBQ). Results Of 2283 students, 851 (37.3%) completed the survey, of whom 742 (87.1%) were women; 722 (84.8%) were enrolled on healthcare programmes, and 129 (15.2%) were enrolled on social work programmes. Most reported good general health and well-being (88.1% and 83.7%, respectively). The total mean scores for the SOC scale, SHIS and OBQ were, respectively, 59.09 (SD = 11.78), 44.04 (SD = 9.38) and 26.40 (SD = 7.07). Well-being and several healthy lifestyles were related to better general health and higher SOC, SHIS and OBQ scores. Multiple linear and logistic regressions showed that perceived well-being and no sleeping problems significantly predicted higher general health and higher SOC, SHIS and OBQ scores. Being less sedentary and non-smoking habits were significant predictors of higher SOC. Conclusions Swedish students in higher education within the healthcare and social work sector report good general health and well-being in the first semester, as well as health-promoting resources (i.e. SOC, SHIS and OBQ), and in some aspects, a healthy lifestyle. High-intensity exercise, no sleeping problems and non-smoking seem to be of importance to both general health and health-promotive resources. This study contributes to knowledge about the health promotive characteristics of students in the healthcare and social work fields, which is of importance for planning universities with a salutogenic approach.

Health promoting lifestyle in educational setting: an intervention study in the universities

“…In another study, it was also stated that the average score of behavior in health promotion in female participants increased after 3 months of intervention [39]. These findings are also consistent with the results of studies that found health promotion interventions lead to increased attitudes toward health-related behaviors, improved skills, and healthy living behaviors [2], [40].…”

“…Health issues have long been a concern among higher education institutions, including health promotion among the campus community. This health promotion-based approach can potentially increase the university's contribution to improving the health of its population [2]. Universities can do many things to promote and protect the health of students and the entire academic community [3].…”

The impact of online interprofessional learning on family health education to prepare collaborative-ready health professionals: A mixed-method study

“…Previous work mentioned that integrating student participation in school education and health promotion is of great importance during education and in preparing for future work and professional roles of health professionals. [ 37 ]…”

Comprehensive analysis of college students' autonomous fitness behavior—a narrative review

“…In recent years, with the advancement of technology and the widespread dissemination of health education ( 12 – 14 ), an increasing number of college students have begun to spontaneously engage in fitness activities, including working out alone, participating in group sports, and using fitness applications ( 5 , 15 , 16 ). From the perspective of agency, the stages of a person's fitness behavior can be divided into four phases: the transition from passive to active, then to autonomous, and finally to automatic (passive-active-autonomous-automatic) ( 17 ).…”