2012
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.062539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hearing with an atympanic ear: good vibration and poor sound-pressure detection in the royal python,Python regius

Abstract: SUMMARYSnakes lack both an outer ear and a tympanic middle ear, which in most tetrapods provide impedance matching between the air and inner ear fluids and hence improve pressure hearing in air. Snakes would therefore be expected to have very poor pressure hearing and generally be insensitive to airborne sound, whereas the connection of the middle ear bone to the jaw bones in snakes should confer acute sensitivity to substrate vibrations. Some studies have nevertheless claimed that snakes are quite sensitive t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
71
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference suggests that auditory sensitivity is not driven by particle motion, as is underwater hearing in fish [39] and lungfish [40]. Also, auditory sensitivity in turtles is probably not based on sound-induced vibrations in the skull, as in the Royal Python [41]. Instead, the different best frequencies suggest another pathway of vibration stimulation to the inner ear, or, more likely, stimulation of a different sensory epithelium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference suggests that auditory sensitivity is not driven by particle motion, as is underwater hearing in fish [39] and lungfish [40]. Also, auditory sensitivity in turtles is probably not based on sound-induced vibrations in the skull, as in the Royal Python [41]. Instead, the different best frequencies suggest another pathway of vibration stimulation to the inner ear, or, more likely, stimulation of a different sensory epithelium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The neurophysiological experiments in air were conducted in a combined acceleration and sound pressure setup previously described (Christensen et al, 2012). To minimize the vibrational noise coupling from the floor, the shaker was put on a 60×60 cm iso-plate passive isolation system (PTT600600, Thorlabs), four passive isolation mounts (PWA075, Thorlabs) and successive layers of flagstone and styrofoam.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may therefore be hypothesized to be unable to detect aerial sound pressure. However, vibration sensitivity has been shown to enable atympanic vertebrates such as snakes and likely also salamanders to sense airborne sound through detection of sound-induced head vibrations (Christensen et al, 2012;Christensen et al, 2015). It is therefore possible that lungfish are also able to sense airborne sound via a similar mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection and analyses were made using MATLAB and RPVDSEX v. 72 (TDT). Both sound and vibrational background noise levels were measured and quantified in octave levels to provide a conservative measure of the potential masking noise [29].…”
Section: (A) Metamorphosismentioning
confidence: 99%