Heat recovery opportunities in UK industry

Abstract

A database of the heat demand, and surplus heat available, at United Kingdom industrial sites involved in the European Union Emissions Trading System, was used to estimate the technical potential of various heat recovery technologies. The options considered were recovery for use on-site, using heat exchangers; upgrading the heat to a higher temperature, using heat pumps; conversion of the heat energy to fulfill a chilling demand, using absorption chillers; conversion of the heat energy to electrical energy, using Rankine cycles; and transport of the heat to fulfill an off-site heat demand. A broad analysis of this type, which investigates a large number of sites, cannot accurately identify site level opportunities. However the analysis can provide an indicative assessment of the overall potential for different technologies. The greatest potential for reusing this surplus heat was found to be recovery at low temperatures, utilising heat exchangers; and in conversion to electricity, mostly using organic Rankine cycle technology. Both these technologies exist in commercial applications, but are not well established, support for their development and installation could increase their use. The overall surplus heat that was technically recoverable using a combination of these technologies was estimated at 52PJ/yr, saving 2.2MtCO 2e /yr in comparison to supplying the energy outputs in a conventional manner. It is thought that a network and market for trading in heat and the wider use of district heating systems could open considerable potential for exporting heat from industrial sites to other users.

Study of biomass applied to a cogeneration system: A steelmaking industry case

“…The overall efficiency of energy use in cogeneration mode can be up to 85 percent and above in some cases. According to Hammond and Norman [20]; all heating processes result in a surplus of heat energy at the end of the process. This surplus thermal energy source can, in certain cases, be recovered and utilized to fulfill an existing energy demand.…”

Industrial energy, materials and products: UK decarbonisation challenges and opportunities

“…Around ∼3.5 PJ/yr of electricity was found to be potentially economically available from UK industry, mainly in a relatively small number of sites in the steel, chemicals and cement sub-sectors. However, this result is sensitive to the input parameters, particularly on the price of electricity and the target payback period employed by companies [23]. Hidden costs, such as those giving rise to the possible disruption of production activities during installation, were found to be a key barrier to the take-up of ORC technology.…”

“…The GHG emissions from the UK industrial sector can be split by sub-sector [1,15,23,45], including emissions from energy use (including those indirectly emitted from electricity use) and process emissions. Sub-sectors with significant process emissions are steel, chemicals, cement, aluminium, glass, ceramics and lime.…”

“…A spatially disaggregated database of surplus heat availability within UK industry [23] was used to estimate the thermodynamic, technical, and economic potentials. Around ∼3.5 PJ/yr of electricity was found to be potentially economically available from UK industry, mainly in a relatively small number of sites in the steel, chemicals and cement sub-sectors.…”

A hierarchical approach for evaluating and selecting waste heat utilization opportunities

“…In Hammond and Norman [8], the potential in waste heat is evaluated for the UK process industries. Technologies considered include Rankine cycles for power generation, heat exchangers for on-site waste heat recovery, mechanical heat pumps for heat upgrade, absorption chillers for chilling provision and heat transport off-site.…”