2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2008.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heat transfer in all pipe flow regimes: laminar, transitional/intermittent, and turbulent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was later developed by the present authors in a series of studies which extended its use to internal flows, flows with adverse pressure gradients in diffusers, and pulsating flows [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Both the SST method and the newly developed transitional method rely upon a control-volume solution method wherein conservation equations are developed at a multitude of elements which constitute the solution domain.…”
Section: Fluid Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was later developed by the present authors in a series of studies which extended its use to internal flows, flows with adverse pressure gradients in diffusers, and pulsating flows [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Both the SST method and the newly developed transitional method rely upon a control-volume solution method wherein conservation equations are developed at a multitude of elements which constitute the solution domain.…”
Section: Fluid Dynamic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later on, the impact of the bonding resistance will be studied in more detail. To determine the interior convective resistance, the Gnielinski correlation [44] found that the Gnielinski correlation is only supported by experimental data in the range Re w > 3100 and should not be used below that value. In the current study Re w varied between 3100 and 7500 during the measurements.…”
Section: Data Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For inspecting the reliability and accuracy of the selfmade experimental system, the pure water as work fluid measured the Nusselt number change with Reynolds number in the range of 2400-3300. The measurements values, which are shown in Figure 3, are compared with the calculated values via the classical Gnielinski equation [17]. From the figure, the deviations between measured and calculated values are less than 12% over the Reynolds number range, which is located in the allowable range of deviation in transition region [9,10].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The results were compared with the predictions of the following Gnielinski equation [17] under fully developed section in transition region:…”
Section: Relative Problem Calculation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%