2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heavy metal contamination assessment of surface sediments of the Subei Shoal, China: Spatial distribution, source apportionment and ecological risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where C f is pollution factor of potentially-toxic element i, Cn is measured content for a single potentially-toxic element, B 0 is the background value for potentially-toxic element, and T r is the toxicity response factor for the given potentially-toxic element, with the following values: Mn = 1 [40], V = Zn = Cr = 2, Cu = Co = Ni = Pb = 5, As = 10, Cd = 30 [41], and Tl = 10 [42]. The grading standards for the ecological risk assessment [43][44][45] are listed in Table S2. The pollution load index (PLI) is widely applied in the pollution evaluation in soils and sediments [46,47].…”
Section: Pollution Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where C f is pollution factor of potentially-toxic element i, Cn is measured content for a single potentially-toxic element, B 0 is the background value for potentially-toxic element, and T r is the toxicity response factor for the given potentially-toxic element, with the following values: Mn = 1 [40], V = Zn = Cr = 2, Cu = Co = Ni = Pb = 5, As = 10, Cd = 30 [41], and Tl = 10 [42]. The grading standards for the ecological risk assessment [43][44][45] are listed in Table S2. The pollution load index (PLI) is widely applied in the pollution evaluation in soils and sediments [46,47].…”
Section: Pollution Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this method, the potential risk coefficient of a single element Er and the potential ecological risk RI are as follows: where C f is pollution factor of potentially-toxic element i , Cn is measured content for a single potentially-toxic element, B 0 is the background value for potentially-toxic element, and T r is the toxicity response factor for the given potentially-toxic element, with the following values: Mn = 1 [ 40 ], V = Zn = Cr = 2, Cu = Co = Ni = Pb = 5, As = 10, Cd = 30 [ 41 ], and Tl = 10 [ 42 ]. The grading standards for the ecological risk assessment [ 43 , 44 , 45 ] are listed in Table S2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential ecological risk index (ERI) posed by Swedish geochemist Lars Håkanson (The National Swedish Environment Protection Board, Water Quality Laboratory Uppsala) is based on the "abundance principle", "sink-effect", and "sensitivity factor" [7]. As a diagnostic tool for pollution control, the potential ecological risk index has been widely used since its development in the 1980s [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediments play a significant role in the release and storage of potentially toxic metals that can lead to ecological and human health risks (Durán et al 2012; Castillo et al 2013; Reible 2014). Heavy metals, like cadmium (Cd), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), total mercury (Hg), nickel (Ni), lead (Pb), as well as the metalloid arsenic (As) pose serious risks to aquatic ecosystems because of their potential toxicity and nonbiodegradable and persistent nature (Zhao et al 2016; Zhang et al 2019), and present an assessment challenge when evaluating their fate and effects in sediments (Eggleton and Thomas 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%