2022
DOI: 10.57266/ijssr.v3i1.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hegemony of Saudi Arabia's Kafala System in The Relationship Between Employer and Indonesian Female Domestic Migrant Workers 2018-2020

Abstract: This study describes the hegemony produced by the Saudi Arabian state through the kafala system in the relationship between employers and female migrant domestic workers from Indonesia. The kafala system creates many problems due to the structural dependence between domestic migrant workers and their employers, ranging from heavy workloads and irregular wages to restrictions on access to mobility. Employers as individual sponsors have a large dominance of power so that the working conditions for domestic migra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under the Kafala system, a migrant worker may be labelled as a 'guest worker' but is often treated as a disposable economic commodity at the mercy of their sponsor (employer). Central to the Kafala system is the imbalance in power relations between the Kafeel (employer) and the kafir (Migrant worker) (Kelly et al, 2022). The Kafeel has the authority to modify the terms and conditions of the employment contract and coerce the migrant worker into accepting unfair working conditions (Parreñas, 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the Kafala system, a migrant worker may be labelled as a 'guest worker' but is often treated as a disposable economic commodity at the mercy of their sponsor (employer). Central to the Kafala system is the imbalance in power relations between the Kafeel (employer) and the kafir (Migrant worker) (Kelly et al, 2022). The Kafeel has the authority to modify the terms and conditions of the employment contract and coerce the migrant worker into accepting unfair working conditions (Parreñas, 2021a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%