2021
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.643383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hepatectomy, RFA, and Other Liver Directed Therapies for Treatment of Breast Cancer Liver Metastasis: A Systematic Review

Abstract: BackgroundThe liver is the second most common site of breast cancer metastasis. Liver directed therapies including hepatic resection, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemo- and radioembolization (TACE/TARE), and hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) have been scarcely researched for breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM). The purpose of this review is to present the known body of literature on these therapies for BCLM.MethodsA systematic review was performed with pre-specified search terms using PubMed, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Primary liver cancer, referred to as liver cancer, is an epithelial malignant tumor originating from the liver ( 1 ). Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, accounting for 5.6% of all cancers ( 2 - 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Primary liver cancer, referred to as liver cancer, is an epithelial malignant tumor originating from the liver ( 1 ). Primary liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer worldwide, accounting for 5.6% of all cancers ( 2 - 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, surgery is not routinely performed for metastatic liver tumors in patients with breast cancer. For patients with disease limited to the liver or stable extrahepatic oligometastatic disease undergoing systemic treatment, the surgical approach has been described in several retrospective series with 5 year OS ranging widely between 9% and 78% [ 6 ]. However, there is high variability in the eligibility criteria for resection, and the weakness of these criteria reflects the lack of identified prognostic, predictive factors, as previously reviewed [ 14 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several retrospective case series have been published evaluating patients’ survival following resection for BCLM, reporting 5 year survival rates ranging from 9% to over 78% [ 4 , 5 , 6 ]. These uneven results are likely due to the highly variable inclusion criteria for hepatic resection among different series, such as the presence or absence of extrahepatic disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of patients who underwent RFA revealed that hepatic resection was associated with better 5-year OS (odds ratio [OR] = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.32–0.46; p <0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.40–0.66; p <0.001) [ 54 ]. Another meta-analysis of 23 studies revealed that hepatic resection resulted in longer median overall survival (mOS) and 5-year survival (45 months, 41%) than RFA (38 months and 11–33%) or TACE (mOS, 19.6 months; 1-year survival: 32–88.8%, n = 8 studies) [ 55 ]. In Taiwan, the most indication for RFA was hepatocellular carcinoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%