1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf00210536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hereditary orthodontic anomalies and idiopathic scoliosis

Abstract: Our study of 202 patients aged from 7 to 17 years treated for idiopathic scoliosis, and with a Cobb angle from 20 degrees to 50 degrees, showed a higher frequency of hereditary orthodontic anomalies than those in the control group. There was unmistakable evidence that acquired orthodontic anomalies occurred in both groups at the same rate of frequency. Our study demonstrated unequivocally that the detection of hereditary orthodontic anomalies in young children allows the identification of a group of children w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
17
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The published literature includes a number of studies investigating the correlation between Angle Class II and specific orthopedic parameters [11,13,15,16,20,21,24,25]. They indicate with varying relevance a potential correlation between scoliosis and weak body posture with Angle Class II malocclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The published literature includes a number of studies investigating the correlation between Angle Class II and specific orthopedic parameters [11,13,15,16,20,21,24,25]. They indicate with varying relevance a potential correlation between scoliosis and weak body posture with Angle Class II malocclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as 1960, Wachsmann [27] reported a "certain correlation" between malocclusion and weak body posture. LukanowaSkopakowa [17], demanded interdisciplinary teamwork between orthodontists and orthopedists in preventive measures and therapy for patients with curvatures of the cervical spine and concomitant malocclusions, as did Pecina et al [20]. In view of the possibility for certain forms of malocclusion to be recognized as juvenile idiopathic scoliosis at an early stage, close interdisciplinary cooperation between orthodontists and orthopedists is desirable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the asymmetries recorded in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and listed in Table 1, only those relating to limb length and femoral anteversion (Burwell, Dangerfield and Vernon, 1977;Burwell et al, 1989) could theoretically be linked to motor function, perhaps via hand and foot preference (Goldberg & Dowling, 1991). However, other structural asymmetries (Mehta, 1981;Normelli et al, 1986;Pecina, Lulic-Ducik & Pecina-Hrncevic, 1991) and non-spinal, sensory asymmetry ) cannot be so easily dismissed. That adolescent idiopathic scoliosis may be classified as asymmetry is demonstrated by Figures 1 and 2.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…They show that in scoliotic patients 69 there is a higher rate of occurrence of hereditary orthodontic anomalies like hypodontia, which is 10 times more frequent and prognathic mandibles. On the other hand, these authors did not find a higher incidence of acquired orthodontic anomalies in scoliosis patients.…”
Section: -3 -2 -Correlation Between Idiopathic Scoliosis and Dento-skmentioning
confidence: 99%