2015
DOI: 10.5569/2340-5104.03.02.01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Herramientas de cribado para la detección de retrasos o trastornos en el desarrollo: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura

Abstract: El objetivo del artículo es analizar los diferentes instrumentos de detección de trastornos o retraso en el desarrollo para valorar la calidad y aplicabilidad de los mismos. Se realiza una revisión sistemática de las publicaciones científicas publicadas en los últimos 25 años (1990-2014) e indexadas en bases de datos internacionales disponibles en línea. El estudio se limita a herramientas de detección basadas en cuestionarios, tests o sistemas de observación de la conducta del niño. Las herramientas o sistema… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these direct observation measures tend to have good reliability and validity they are time intensive to code and few have been used cross-culturally. For more information about these tools see the review by Alcantud et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these direct observation measures tend to have good reliability and validity they are time intensive to code and few have been used cross-culturally. For more information about these tools see the review by Alcantud et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 2500 relevant scientific articles were analyzed, concluding that the detection and correct diagnosis of ASD should be carried out at two levels: routine developmental surveillance and the diagnosis and assessment of ASD [ 15 ]. Screening instruments are usually classified into these two levels: those of universal application or level I instruments that only detect a “developmental delay” [ 16 ] and those of level II, which are usually specific to ASD or another disorder [ 17 ]. The current challenge is how the age of detection of ASD can be lowered to below 24 months without increasing false positives.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%