2019
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v33i01.330110061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Heterogeneous Attributed Network Embedding with Graph Convolutional Networks

Abstract: Network embedding which assigns nodes in networks to lowdimensional representations has received increasing attention in recent years. However, most existing approaches, especially the spectral-based methods, only consider the attributes in homogeneous networks. They are weak for heterogeneous attributed networks that involve different node types as well as rich node attributes and are common in real-world scenarios. In this paper, we propose HANE, a novel network embedding method based on Graph Convolutional … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HetGNN [33] and HeGAN [8] incorporate bi-directional LSTM, attention mechanism, and generative adversarial networks (GAN) for heterogeneous network embedding. These methods rely on domain knowledge to choose the valuable metapaths, whereas there also exist several methods [26,32] which do not require meta-path selection. However, HANE [26] transforms various types of nodes with different attributes into a uniform space, which cannot distinguish the diversity of edges between nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…HetGNN [33] and HeGAN [8] incorporate bi-directional LSTM, attention mechanism, and generative adversarial networks (GAN) for heterogeneous network embedding. These methods rely on domain knowledge to choose the valuable metapaths, whereas there also exist several methods [26,32] which do not require meta-path selection. However, HANE [26] transforms various types of nodes with different attributes into a uniform space, which cannot distinguish the diversity of edges between nodes.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods rely on domain knowledge to choose the valuable metapaths, whereas there also exist several methods [26,32] which do not require meta-path selection. However, HANE [26] transforms various types of nodes with different attributes into a uniform space, which cannot distinguish the diversity of edges between nodes. GTN [32] needs explicit products of candidate adjacency matrices and requires additional memory space and computing resources.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…References [23]- [25] integrate meta paths and attention mechanism to capture the semantic information in HNs. Reference [26] separates the same type of nodes from Heterogeneous Information Networks (HINs), then aggregates the heterogeneous neighbors.…”
Section: B Neural Model On Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relations between two entities are easily captured by a graph [25,26], wherein a collection of pairwise edges (either directed or undirected) encapsulates the relational structure (e.g., friendship relations between two people on a social network [32,1]). Moreover, heterogeneous graphs [31,37] are used to capture relationship structures between entities of multiple "types" (e.g., a bibliographic network [9] between nodes of type author, paper, venue, etc.). However, when the number of types is restricted to two (say, "left" and "right"), and relations exist only across (and not among) them, we resort to a bipartite graph [20] (e.g., an author-paper bibliography network).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%