2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2019.8803614
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical Multi-Task Network For Race, Gender and Facial Attractiveness Recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…contributing to attractiveness, we tested it on the SCUT-FBP5500 dataset (Liang et al, 2018) with attractiveness scores, which has been used for emerging studies of facial attractiveness analysis in both computer vision (Xu et al, 2019;Shi et al, 2019) and the psychological community (Zhao et al, 2019). The dataset contains 5,500 face images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…contributing to attractiveness, we tested it on the SCUT-FBP5500 dataset (Liang et al, 2018) with attractiveness scores, which has been used for emerging studies of facial attractiveness analysis in both computer vision (Xu et al, 2019;Shi et al, 2019) and the psychological community (Zhao et al, 2019). The dataset contains 5,500 face images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the female faces, the average correlation coefficient between the scores of Neuron-HAF and the attractiveness scores was r = 0.7583±0.0198, all p <0.00001 (seeFigure 3a), whereas the average correlation coefficient between the scores of Neuron-UAF and the attractiveness scores was r = −0.5655 ± 0.0217, all p < 0.00001. For the male faces, the average correlation coefficient between the scores of Neuron-HAM and the attractiveness scores was r = 0.6653 ± 0.0161, all p < 0.00001 (seeFigure 3b), whereas the average correlation coefficient between the scores of Neuron-UAM and the attractiveness scores was r = −0.6221 ± 0.0202, all p < 0.00001 Xu et al (2019). found that the handcrafted feature-based models can predict attractiveness scores with Pearson correlations of [0.6, 0.7] whereas the DNN-based models can predict attractiveness scores with Pearson correlations of [0.8,0.9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This multi-task framework improves the performance of both tasks and alleviates the over-fitting problem in training the network. Xu et al [31] also proposed a multi-task deep learning framework for facial attractiveness, gender, and race prediction, achieving state-of-the-art performance. Zhou et al [32] presented a system for analyzing trends in perceived attractiveness of Chinese males at different times.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there is a growing wave of research in multi-task learning, by which diverse computer vision tasks are solved. Lu et al [35] proposed a hierarchical multi-task network (HMTNet), which can achieve the effect of simultaneously identifying a person's gender, race, and facial attractiveness from a given portrait image. A DMTL model for keypoint detection, face detection, posture estimation was proposed by [36].…”
Section: B Multi-task Transfer Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%