Proceedings International Test Conference 1997
DOI: 10.1109/test.1997.639705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hierarchical specification-driven analog fault modeling for efficient fault simulation and diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the initialization loop, on average n · Pr{P > s u } (23) samples in the set B 1 will satisfy P > s u and will be placed in the set C 1 . As already mentioned, it is expected that |C 1 | N. In the first iteration of the statistical blockade loop, the number of samples x ∈ A x visited to finally fill in the set B 2 with n samples is on average…”
Section: B Simulation Effort For Generating the Parametric Fault Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the initialization loop, on average n · Pr{P > s u } (23) samples in the set B 1 will satisfy P > s u and will be placed in the set C 1 . As already mentioned, it is expected that |C 1 | N. In the first iteration of the statistical blockade loop, the number of samples x ∈ A x visited to finally fill in the set B 2 with n samples is on average…”
Section: B Simulation Effort For Generating the Parametric Fault Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of programs that enable these simulations are the combination of ELDO (a mixed-signal simulator marketed by Mentor Graphics ® ) and VHDL-AMS, SABER (a mixed-signal simulator marketed by Analogy Inc.) with its' behavioural language MAST and SMASH with its' behavioural language ABCD. Examples of tools that support hierarchical fault simulation are MiST PROFIT [7], Faultmaxx [8] and GDSFaultsim [9]. Some of these tools combine hierarchical and statistical fault simulation.…”
Section: Closed Loop System Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, a fault can be differentiated from another fault (or from the fault-free instance) only when the corresponding measurement in the former differs from the latter by a certain minimum threshold. This threshold depends on component tolerances and measurement inaccuracy and is computed by the techniques described in [9]. In this paper, we assume the threshold is given as an input to the test generation program.…”
Section: Test Generation For Analog Circuitsmentioning
confidence: 99%