2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-flux and fouling-resistant membranes for brackish water desalination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several pieces of research on the development of fouling-resistant LPRO membrane were also conducted by the modification of membrane surface [34][35][36][37][38]. Furthermore, Huang et al suggested the necessity of more advanced pretreatment process to prevent membrane fouling occurrence in the LPRO membrane adopted water treatment system [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several pieces of research on the development of fouling-resistant LPRO membrane were also conducted by the modification of membrane surface [34][35][36][37][38]. Furthermore, Huang et al suggested the necessity of more advanced pretreatment process to prevent membrane fouling occurrence in the LPRO membrane adopted water treatment system [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Covalent bonding of hydrophilic groups is another attempt to improve fouling resistant performance [16][17][18][19]. Addition of monofunctional structure (o-Aminobenzoic acid-triethylamine salt) into the ingredient of interfacial polymerization, then coating of cross-linked PEG can improve the flux and antifouling performance of membranes according to Ho's work [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bigger flux drops imply that lysozyme is easier to be adsorbed on membrane surface compared to BSA, causing heavier fouling. This is because lysozyme is positively charged and can be adsorbed on the negatively charged membrane surface via electrostatic attraction . However, we notice that the lignin‐coated membrane shows slightly better resistance to lysozyme adsorption although it carries more negative charges than the virgin membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This is because lysozyme is positively charged and can be adsorbed on the negatively charged membrane surface via electrostatic attraction. 41 However, we notice that the lignin-coated membrane shows slightly better resistance to lysozyme adsorption although it carries more negative charges than the virgin membrane. The coated membrane has a smoother surface as revealed by SEM and AFM examinations, which contributes to repel protein adsorption.…”
Section: Performances Of the Lignin-coated Membranesmentioning
confidence: 76%