2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08156-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation versus surgical interventions for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our results a current meta-analysis including 4450 women compared HIFU with surgical interventions for symptomatic uterine fibroids proving the superiority of HIFU regarding symptomatic relief and improvement of quality of life at 6- and 12-month follow-up, duration of hospital stays and time to return to work 30 34 . There were no significant differences in terms of symptom recurrence, re-interventions and pregnancy 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In line with our results a current meta-analysis including 4450 women compared HIFU with surgical interventions for symptomatic uterine fibroids proving the superiority of HIFU regarding symptomatic relief and improvement of quality of life at 6- and 12-month follow-up, duration of hospital stays and time to return to work 30 34 . There were no significant differences in terms of symptom recurrence, re-interventions and pregnancy 30 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Comparatively, inertial cavitation is more violent and may induce irreversible membrane disruption and cell implosion or hemorrhage in tissues[ 76 ]. HIFU is regularly used in prostate cancer or in the management of uterine fibroids[ 77 , 78 ] but also in the management of PDAC, although it is much less common. HIFU has been suggested to improve quality of life and alleviate pain in patients with a metastatic course of their disease[ 79 ].…”
Section: Hifumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple past studies have demonstrated that low-dose MFP maintains the same efficacy and has fewer adverse effects than high-dose MFP [ 20 , 23 – 25 ]. Although various treatment regimens for UFs have been investigated, unfortunately, none of these regimens have proven to be a perfect solution for leiomyoma management in the majority of patients with UFs, and remission of UFs remains suboptimal [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%