2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-performance bioelectronic tongue using ligand binding domain T1R1 VFT for umami taste detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Firstly, the structure of each kBMP ( k = 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12) was successfully predicted and assessed with PEP‐FOLD3 and I‐TASSER. Then, the VFTD/hT1R1 was chosen as the major binding domain of umami substance in the receptor (Toda et al , ; Ahn et al , ), because of its importance in the umami substance recognition (Li, ; Toda et al , ). Its structure was modelled using the crystal structure of VFTD of human CaSR (VFTD/hCaSR, PDB: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=5K5T) as template based on the result of sequence alignment (Figure S1), and its homology modelling structure was considered to be reasonable based on PROCHECK calculation (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, the structure of each kBMP ( k = 1, 2, 4, 8, 10 and 12) was successfully predicted and assessed with PEP‐FOLD3 and I‐TASSER. Then, the VFTD/hT1R1 was chosen as the major binding domain of umami substance in the receptor (Toda et al , ; Ahn et al , ), because of its importance in the umami substance recognition (Li, ; Toda et al , ). Its structure was modelled using the crystal structure of VFTD of human CaSR (VFTD/hCaSR, PDB: http://www.rcsb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=5K5T) as template based on the result of sequence alignment (Figure S1), and its homology modelling structure was considered to be reasonable based on PROCHECK calculation (Figure S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…were lower than others studies but unacceptable in practical applications. 31,32 Overall results depicted that the more specific the receptor is, the more sensitive to the perception of ligands. As a broad-spectrum umami receptor, although T1R1 could recognize multiple ligands, its sensitivity was obviously worse than mGluRs.…”
Section: Optimization Of Response Potential and Timementioning
confidence: 93%
“…The size of the graphene channel was about 50 µm × 50 µm. The fabrication of GEs method is the same as previous study 45 .…”
Section: Intracellular Calcium Assay For Calcium Signalling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%