2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-precision determination of residual stress of polycrystalline coatings using optimised XRD-sin2ψ technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the measurement, the position of a peak with specific Miller indices is measured at different tilt angles to get the change in d-spacing as a function of the tilt angle. The fundamental equation for an XRD-sin 2 ψ stress measurement can be written as 48,49 …”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the measurement, the position of a peak with specific Miller indices is measured at different tilt angles to get the change in d-spacing as a function of the tilt angle. The fundamental equation for an XRD-sin 2 ψ stress measurement can be written as 48,49 …”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A parabolic approach technique of 0.6 I max (I max denoting the maximum intensity of a diffraction peak) was adopted to determine the diffraction angle, 2θ, as our previous research revealed that parabolic approach ensures the highest precision in peak positioning measurement [25]. Then, using each measured 2θ value, the precise values of the off-axis angle, ψ, crystal plane d-spacing, d, and lattice parameter, a, were deduced accordingly.…”
Section: Xrd Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of transition metal nitrides, a number of papers reported the anisotropic elastic modulus of titanium nitride coatings [8,[20][21][22][23][24]. For the data scattering in a linear d-sin 2 ψ plot, it has been reported that the method of diffraction peak positioning has significant influence on the precision of the linear d-sin 2 ψ regression and the parabolic method was recommended to give the lowest scattering [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the measurement of residual stress, the sin 2 ψ technique was employed based on slow scans of the (111) and (220) planes at step size of 0.033 0 and step time of 300 -700 seconds respectively. The diffraction peak positions were determined by the parabolic approach following our recent optimization of XRD residual stress measurement [23] . The Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio values were taken from literature to be 300 GPa and 0.23 respectively [23] .…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diffraction peak positions were determined by the parabolic approach following our recent optimization of XRD residual stress measurement [23] . The Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio values were taken from literature to be 300 GPa and 0.23 respectively [23] . A Philips CM20 TEM was used to characterize the crosssectional structure of the deposited coatings.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%