“…[4] Cost reductions are achieved from all facets of PSC development from early materials development to final module installation. These include:t he developmento fi ndium-tin-oxide (ITO)-free alternatives; [5,6] large-scale simples ynthetic routes to high-efficiency photoactivep olymers; [7,8] the vacuum-free productiono fm odules; [9][10][11] extremely fast manufacture through roll-to-roll coating and printing techniques; [12,13] improvements in module design, for example,t o achieve high geometric fill factor modules; [14] in situ assembly of an infinite number of modules, [15] and fast installation, as demonstrated by the first PSC-based solar cell parkd elivering kW levels of energy. [16] Some efforts, albeit to al esser degree than those dedicated to cost minimizationa nd efficiency improvements, have also been dedicated to maximizing the durability or stability of PSCs.A lthough the degradation mechanisms at play in organic solar cells and modules have been the subjecto faplethora of studies and have been reviewed on many occasions, [17,18] there are only af ew examples of how these understandings have translated into improvingo re nhancing the real-world stability of PSCs.C ertainly,t here are an umber of accelerated ageings tudies on small devices and large-area modules predicting lifetimes even up to 15-20 years, [9,19,20] however these studies may not capturet he real environmental stressest hat are often harsher than those commonly used in accelerated studies on PSCs.J udgingf rom the literature, accelerated tests under 1sun conditions,A M1.5G at at emperature of 30-70 8Ca re the preferred test conditions for predicting lifetimes, [9,13,19,21,22] which,i nt urn, is calculated by matching the irradiation exposure of as olar cell under…”