2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2009.00286.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High‐resolution seabed imagery as a tool for biodiversity conservation planning on continental margins

Abstract: Submarine canyons increase seascape diversity on continental margins and harbour diverse and abundant biota vulnerable to fishing. Because many canyons are fished, there is an increasing emphasis on including them in conservation areas on continental margins. Here we report on sponge diversity and bottom cover in three canyons of South‐eastern Australia, test the performance of biological and abiotic surrogates, and evaluate how biological data from detailed seabed surveys can be used in conservation planning … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of morphospecies is somewhat problematic, as cryptic species will be considered under a single grouping while other groups showing greater morphological variation (e.g. sponges) may be split into more groups, but their use is common in marine studies where imagery is used as the main sampling tool (Soltwedel et al 2009, Schlacher et al 2010, Compton et al 2013. Although the use of higher taxonomic levels is another option to estimate biodiversity (Roy et al 1996), these tend to be more useful when investigating broader scale patterns -and in the case of our dataset, even family-level identification of sponges is problematic without specimen collection.…”
Section: Biological Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of morphospecies is somewhat problematic, as cryptic species will be considered under a single grouping while other groups showing greater morphological variation (e.g. sponges) may be split into more groups, but their use is common in marine studies where imagery is used as the main sampling tool (Soltwedel et al 2009, Schlacher et al 2010, Compton et al 2013. Although the use of higher taxonomic levels is another option to estimate biodiversity (Roy et al 1996), these tend to be more useful when investigating broader scale patterns -and in the case of our dataset, even family-level identification of sponges is problematic without specimen collection.…”
Section: Biological Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Banks & Skilleter 2007, McArthur et al 2010, Schlacher et al 2010. The basic tenet of this approach is that the measures of habitat structure used are accurate and biologically relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On deep mesophotic (depth > 30 m) temperate reefs, sessile invertebrates, including sponges, cnidarians, ascidians and bryozoans, dominate and contribute to the diversity, structure and functioning of benthic ecosystems (Fromont et al 2006, Bell 2007, Schlacher et al 2010, Schönberg & Fromont 2012. Larger sessile invertebrates, in particular sponges, gorgonians and octocorals, provide essential structural and functional ecosystem services, including nutrient provisioning and recycling (de Goeij et al 2013) (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger sessile invertebrates, in particular sponges, gorgonians and octocorals, provide essential structural and functional ecosystem services, including nutrient provisioning and recycling (de Goeij et al 2013) (i.e. benthic−pelagic coupling), as well as provision of complex habitat and refuge for other organisms (Fromont et al 2006, Bell 2007, Schlacher et al 2010, Schönberg & Fromont 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%