Proceedings 1997 International Conference on Network Protocols
DOI: 10.1109/icnp.1997.643677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High speed, scalable, and accurate implementation of packet fair queueing algorithms in ATM networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase in start-time is comparable to that of some techniques which attempt to reduce the implementation complexity of scheduling algorithms, such as the technique presented in [3], and furthermore, this worst-case scenario is highly unlikely in a core network which handles a large number of flows. Consider another scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…This increase in start-time is comparable to that of some techniques which attempt to reduce the implementation complexity of scheduling algorithms, such as the technique presented in [3], and furthermore, this worst-case scenario is highly unlikely in a core network which handles a large number of flows. Consider another scenario.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…r-~c = Exp^2 nc{tl) )- (7)(8)(9)(10) In addition, since fi nc (t) > r inc (t)/C, for any t, the following inequality follows trivially…”
Section: T") By Assuming That R Inc (T) Is a Continuous Function Omentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The operations can be as simple as deciding whether to drop or queue the packet (e.g., FRED), or as complex as manipulation of priority queues (e.g., Fair Queueing). While a number of techniques have been proposed to reduce the complexity of the per packet operations [9,94,99], and commercial implementations are available in some intermediate class routers, it is still unclear whether these algorithms can be cost-effectively implemented in high-speed backbone routers because all these algorithms still require packet classification and per flow state management. In this chapter, we address the complexity problem by describing a solution based on Dynamic Packet State to provide fair bandwidth allocation within a SCORE domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second complication is in each rate group, sorting among different sessions should be avoided. Therefore, a newly backlogged session will be assigned a value at least as large as that of the tail of the backlogged sessions in the rate group [3] but still in the range . In dual-rate session grouping, there are three additional complications regarding the overflow of the timestamp and sorting in the rate group.…”
Section: Maintaining Cell Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To implement PFQ algorithms with LBT and GBT properties, Stephens et al [3], [7] proposed a scheduler architecture which is also applied in a cell-based scheduler in [8]. In this architecture, sessions with same rate are grouped together and the scheduler only supports a fixed number of rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%