“…Compared with the Fe II SCO systems prone to oxidation, Fe III compounds have the advantage of generally being air-stable and thus may be expected to form more robust materials. , In the case of Fe III SCO complexes, the thermally induced SCO is associated with a switch between the S = 1/2 (LS) and S = 5/2 (HS) spin states. , Importantly, although the change of the spin value is the same (Δ S = 2) as that in the Fe II complexes, the changes of the spin entropy (9.13 J K –1 mol –1 ) and the metal–ligand bond lengths (0.10–0.13 Å) during the spin transition in the Fe III complexes are both significantly smaller than those in the Fe II complexes (13.38 J K –1 mol –1 and typically around 0.20 Å). These differences lead to significantly different behaviors of the Fe III SCO complexes, such as the rapid spin interconversion rates between the LS and HS states, difficulty to achieve Fe III SCO complexes with abrupt SCO transition, and rare observation of the LIESST effects. ,, To fulfill the desired ligand field for the SCO transition, a suitable coordination donor set is required, which is usually an N 6 donor set for the Fe II system and an N 4 O 2 donor set for the Fe III system. , Experimentally, the N 4 O 2 environment for the Fe III SCO system is usually realized by the coordination of two tridentate Schiff-base ligands, which are often easily prepared from salicylaldehyde and different amines. Among these Schiff-base ligands, the N -quinolylsalicylaldimine (Hqsal) ligand has been studied most widely, generating many interesting SCO materials of outstanding performances. , Many of these materials exhibit abrupt, hysteresis, and/or stepwise SCO behaviors.…”