2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2004.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput preparative process utilizing three complementary chromatographic purification technologies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As these workstations operate in sequential mode, the time needed for screening is, however, relatively long. Parallelization of preparative chromatographic steps on the other hand is not very widespread [11,12]. Automation and parallelization of chromatographic operations usually do not affect the chromatographic process itself whereas miniaturization is known to have a significant impact on chromatographic resolution in particular due to packing problems and wall effects [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As these workstations operate in sequential mode, the time needed for screening is, however, relatively long. Parallelization of preparative chromatographic steps on the other hand is not very widespread [11,12]. Automation and parallelization of chromatographic operations usually do not affect the chromatographic process itself whereas miniaturization is known to have a significant impact on chromatographic resolution in particular due to packing problems and wall effects [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its column efficiency is the same as that of RP-HPLC, allowing better separation of structurally similar compounds. A preparative process based on UV-only triggering is inadequate for collecting compounds without chromophores, while one based on MS detection usually only collects products which are sufficiently ionized [7]. For the separation of a complex sample, mass-triggered collection often reaches a higher selectivity than UV-triggered collection due to a specific mass-to-charge ratio (m/z).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the use of supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) has become the method of choice in pharmaceutical discovery research labs for quickly separating and purifying chiral compounds. SFC has many advantages over traditional liquid chromatography, most notably supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO 2 ) has much lower viscosity and a much higher diffusivity rate than traditionally used solvents [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. As a result, high flow rates can be used without losing efficiency resulting in shorter run times and much faster equilibration times while providing excellent efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%