High-throughput, quantitative assessment of the effects of low-dose silica nanoparticles on lung cells: grasping complex toxicity with a great depth of field

Abstract

BackgroundThe toxicity of manufactured fumed silica nanoparticles (NPs) remains poorly investigated compared to that of crystalline silica NPs, which have been associated with lung diseases after inhalation. Amorphous silica NPs are a raw material for manufactured nanocomposites, such as cosmetics, foods, and drugs, raising concerns about their potential toxicity.ResultsThe size of the NPs was determined by dynamic light scattering and their shape was visualized by atomic force microscopy (10 ± 4 nm). The pertinent toxicological concentration and dynamic ranges were determined using viability tests and cellular impedance. We combined transcriptomics and proteomics to assess the cellular and molecular effects of fumed silica in A549 human alveolar epithelial cells. The “no observed transcriptomic adverse effect level” (NOTEL) was set to 1.0 μg/cm2, and the “lowest observed adverse transcriptional effect level” (LOTEL) was set at 1.5 μg/cm2. We carried out genome-wide expression profiles with microarrays and identified, by shotgun proteomics, the exoproteome changes in lung cells after exposure to NP doses (0.1, 1.0, 1.5, 3.0, and 6.0 μg/cm2) at two time points (24 h and 72 h). The data revealed a hierarchical, dose-dependent cellular response to silica NPs. At 1.5 μg/cm2, the Rho signaling cascade, actin cytoskeleton remodeling, and clathrin-mediated endocytosis were induced. At 3.0 μg/cm2, many inflammatory mediators were upregulated and the coagulation system pathway was triggered. Lastly, at 6.0 μg/cm2, oxidative stress was initiated. The proteins identified in the extracellular compartment were consistent with these findings.ConclusionsThe alliance of two high-throughput technologies allowed the quantitative assessment of the cellular effects and molecular consequences of exposure of lung cells to low doses of NPs. These results were obtained using a pathway-driven analysis instead of isolated genes. As in photography, toxicogenomics allows, at the same time, the visualization of a wide spectrum of biological responses and a “zoom in” to the details with a great depth of field. This study illustrates how such an approach based on human cell culture models is a valuable predictive screening tool to evaluate the toxicity of many potentially harmful emerging substances, alone or in mixtures, in the framework of future regulatory reinforcements.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1521-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Developing a tissue glue by engineering the adhesive and hemostatic properties of metal oxide nanoparticles

“…This is in line with previous reports on the highly hemolytic activity of various silica nanoparticles attributing their toxicity to particle characteristics including geometry, porosity and surface charge 46 . This finding also confirms that the application of highly concentrated silica nanoparticle suspensions poses issues concerning toxicity and biodegradability [47][48][49][50] . Interestingly, surface-equivalent amounts of bioglass are less lytic and only show significant lysis at concentrations of 1 mg/mL.…”

Genetic susceptibility to toxicologic lung responses among inbred mouse strains following exposure to carbon nanotubes and profiling of underlying gene networks

“…TREM 1-deficient mice are shown to have effective lung infection clearance but reduced disease severity (Weber et al, 2014), suggesting that TREM1 signaling may be an important regulator of adverse inflammatory pathology in the lung. In an in vitro toxicogenomic study of amorphous silica nanoparticles, cultured human T2Ps (A549 cell line) exhibited TREM1 pathway activation (using IPA) in response to exposure (Pisani et al, 2015). The expression of TREM 1 pathway activity in T2Ps could therefore plausibly be relevant to the T2P hyperplasia seen in susceptible mouse models of exposure to nanoparticles in the present study.…”

Toxicity assessment of silica nanoparticles on Allium cepa

“…Despite the wide range of research about nanoparticles (NP) and nanotechnology there are few studies on the effects of these nanomaterials on health and especially on environmental impacts. Silica nanoparticles (SiNP) are extensively used in manufactured products, for example in additives to drugs, in the chemical industry, in printer toners, in cosmetics and in food (Gordon et al, 2009;Van Hoecke et al, 2011;Fede et al, 2012;Izak-Nau et al, 2014;Pisani et al, 2015). Nanoparticle materials that are between 1 and 100 nanometres are usually more toxic than bulk materials of larger size (Sager et al, 2008;Kim et al, 2012).…”