2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00238-008-0273-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-valve vapor-permeable film dressing versus fine mesh gauze dressing on skin graft donor areas in diabetic patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The studies by Ferreira et al and Lui et al found no difference between a dry and moist dressing approach; both researchers compared the use of the biological film dressing Veloderm® with dry dressings. Twelve studies found that the dressings that provided a moist wound‐healing environment were superior to non‐moist dressings in terms of pain reduction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The studies by Ferreira et al and Lui et al found no difference between a dry and moist dressing approach; both researchers compared the use of the biological film dressing Veloderm® with dry dressings. Twelve studies found that the dressings that provided a moist wound‐healing environment were superior to non‐moist dressings in terms of pain reduction …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, several researchers used a variety of definitions of healing; this subsequently reduced comparison between the studies. In addition, some studies did not provide operational definitions of healing, which increased the risk of systematic error. Other studies were at risk of researcher bias by not identifying the level of training or experience of the assessors .…”
Section: Methodological and Academic Rigour Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations