2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.91.104019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Higuchi ghosts and gradient instabilities in bimetric gravity

Abstract: Bimetric gravity theories allow for many different types of cosmological solutions, but not all of them are theoretically allowed. In this work we discuss the conditions to satisfy the Higuchi bound and to avoid gradient instabilities in the scalar sector at the linear level. We find that in expanding universes the ratio of the scale factors of the reference and observable metric has to increase at all times. This automatically implies a ghost-free helicity-2 and helicity-0 sector and enforces a phantom dark e… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
88
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. Unfortunately, although the simplest bigravity models are able to provide viable self-accelerating background expansions, all such models suffer from ghost and/or gradient instabilities [117,112,114,118]. While it is possible to push these instabilities back to unobservably early times, beyond the regime of validity of the theory, without losing self-acceleration and obtaining a technically natural acceleration parameter [119], the theory becomes observationally indistinguishable from ΛCDM in this case.…”
Section: Gravity In Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116]. Unfortunately, although the simplest bigravity models are able to provide viable self-accelerating background expansions, all such models suffer from ghost and/or gradient instabilities [117,112,114,118]. While it is possible to push these instabilities back to unobservably early times, beyond the regime of validity of the theory, without losing self-acceleration and obtaining a technically natural acceleration parameter [119], the theory becomes observationally indistinguishable from ΛCDM in this case.…”
Section: Gravity In Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(IIc) Exotic branches: These are all other branches which generically lead to bouncing cosmologies or static universes in the asymptotic past or future [210]. Even though it is not impossible to make such scenarios compatible with observations, these branches correspond to rather unconventional cosmologies and have not been studied in great detail so far.…”
Section: Classification Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= are free of scalar instabilities [208], in general the perturbations around this class of FLRW backgrounds suffer from ghosts in both the scalar and tensor sectors [209,210,217]. Due to these pathologies, branch IIa solutions do not correspond to consistent backgrounds and must be discarded on theoretical grounds.…”
Section: Classification Of Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is quite natural to begin this program from the first part. Indeed, it is highly nontrivial to construct IR modifications of GR that are cosmologically viable, as has been learned from experience with the DGP model [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the dRGT theory of massive gravity [10][11][12][13][14][15][16], Hassan-Rosen bigravity [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], or nonlocal models of the Deser-Woodard type [28][29][30][31]. Indeed, none of these attempts has yet produced a viable competitor to ΛCDM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%