S yStematic reviews and meta-analyses are fundamental tools used to interpret the effectiveness of a treatment across many studies. Recently, the need to conduct systematic reviews and meta-analyses of animal studies modeling clinically relevant problems has been highlighted. 9,13,36 In particular, systematic reviews of animal experiments will allow decisions regarding the design and conduct of subsequent clinical trials to be based on the entirety of the existing evidence that is synthesized in an unbiased manner. Moreover, systematic reviews permit a more objective appraisal of evidence than is allowed by the traditional narrative-style reviews that are more commonly associated with animal research. Traumatic brain injury (TBI), which is the leading cause of long-term disability in children and young adults worldwide, 11 causes a variety of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral problems that can occur either individually or in combination. 20,40 In the US, a case of TBI occurs every 15 seconds, resulting in 1.7 million new head injury victims per year. Each year, on average, these events are responsible for 50,000 deaths, leave 80,000 individuals with permanent disabilities, and cost more than US$77 billion. 34 However, there are no pharmacological treat- Object. Erythropoietin (EPO) shows promise as a neuroprotective agent in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, clinical trials of the efficacy of EPO treatment in patients with TBI yield conflicting results. The authors conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effect of EPO in experimental animal models of TBI, the goal being to inform the design of future clinical trials.Methods. The authors identified eligible studies by searching PubMed, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar in October 2013. Data were pooled using the random-effects model, and results were reported in terms of standardized mean difference. Statistical heterogeneity was examined using both I 2 and chi-square tests, and the presence of small study effects was investigated with funnel plots and Egger tests. In-depth analyses were performed for lesion volume and neurobehavioral outcome, and the studies' methodological quality was also evaluated.Results. Of a total of 290 studies, 13 found an effect of EPO on lesion volume and neurobehavioral outcome. Overall, the methodological quality of the studies was poor, and there was evidence of statistical heterogeneity among the publications as well as small-study effects. However, in-depth analyses showed statistically significant findings in favor of a beneficial effect of EPO after TBI.Conclusions. Despite limitations of this systematic review that may have influenced the findings, the authors conclude that EPO might be beneficial in treating experimental TBI in terms of reducing lesion volume and improving neurobehavioral outcome. However, this review also indicates that more well-designed and well-reported animal studies are needed. (http://thejns.org/doi/abs/10.3171/2014.6.JNS132577)
KeY Wo...