2019
DOI: 10.1111/nph.16314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Historical changes in the stomatal limitation of photosynthesis: empirical support for an optimality principle

Abstract: Summary The ratio of leaf internal (ci) to ambient (ca) partial pressure of CO2, defined here as χ, is an index of adjustments in both leaf stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate to environmental conditions. Measurements and proxies of this ratio can be used to constrain vegetation model uncertainties for predicting terrestrial carbon uptake and water use. We test a theory based on the least‐cost optimality hypothesis for modelling historical changes in χ over the 1951–2014 period, across different tre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stomatal behaviour then minimises aE / A + bV cmax / A where a and b are the unit costs for transpiration and carboxylation capacity ( V cmax ), respectively (Prentice et al , 2014). The least‐cost hypothesis has been shown to generate realistic predictions of variation in both N area and χ in response to environmental variables, specifically site temperature during the growing season, vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and elevation (Wang et al , 2017; Dong et al , 2017a; Lavergne et al , 2020). Finally, the ‘coordination hypothesis’ states that the Rubisco‐ and electron transport‐limited rates of photosynthesis are co‐limiting under typical daytime conditions in the field (Chen et al , 1993; Dong et al , 2017a; Togashi et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stomatal behaviour then minimises aE / A + bV cmax / A where a and b are the unit costs for transpiration and carboxylation capacity ( V cmax ), respectively (Prentice et al , 2014). The least‐cost hypothesis has been shown to generate realistic predictions of variation in both N area and χ in response to environmental variables, specifically site temperature during the growing season, vapour pressure deficit (VPD) and elevation (Wang et al , 2017; Dong et al , 2017a; Lavergne et al , 2020). Finally, the ‘coordination hypothesis’ states that the Rubisco‐ and electron transport‐limited rates of photosynthesis are co‐limiting under typical daytime conditions in the field (Chen et al , 1993; Dong et al , 2017a; Togashi et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inter-annual variations of vegetation productivity in semi-arid areas are closely related to drought and inter-annual variability of precipitation [9,10], and vegetation dynamics in turn exerts a strong controlling effect on regional water circulation [11]. Consequently, the terrestrial carbon and water cycles are strongly coupled in the semi-arid regions [12]. Understanding the relationship between plant production and water usage is critical for projecting the dynamics of semi-arid ecosystems and their responses to climate change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water use efficiency (WUE), defined as the amount of carbon fixed per unit of water transpired, measures the trade-off between carbon gain and water loss of terrestrial ecosystems [13], and has been used as a key indicator of the coupling of ecosystem carbon and water cycles. However, the variability of WUE and its controlling factors in semi-arid regions are not well understood [12,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated monthly mean daytime air T (°C) and D (kPa) at each site from monthly 0.5° resolution climate data provided by the Climatic Research Unit (CRU TS4.03; Harris et al., 2014), as in our previous study (Lavergne et al., 2020; see Text S1). Monthly atmospheric CO 2 concentrations ([CO 2 ], ppm) for the 1901–2018 period were obtained at each site by extrapolating monthly data extracted from the nearest grid cell of the CarbonTraker measurements and modelling system (2000–2018 period; 3° × 2° resolution; version CT2019 [Jacobson et al., 2020]; http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/carbontracker/; last access July 2020) using a recent compilation based on ice core data and direct measurements (Köhler et al., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%