1994
DOI: 10.1109/55.289471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot-electron trapping activation energy in PMOSFET's under mechanical stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3. 9,[22][23][24] This affects the stability of interface traps, resulting in a change in T . 24 In P b0 center, compressive stress along ͓110͔ decreases bond angle ⍜ 1 and increases the other bond angle ⍜ 2 , due to ͑1͒ ͑100͒ Si substrate surface structure and ͑2͒ dangling bond along the ͓111͔ direction.…”
Section: Impact Of Mechanical Stress On Direct and Trap-assisted Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. 9,[22][23][24] This affects the stability of interface traps, resulting in a change in T . 24 In P b0 center, compressive stress along ͓110͔ decreases bond angle ⍜ 1 and increases the other bond angle ⍜ 2 , due to ͑1͒ ͑100͒ Si substrate surface structure and ͑2͒ dangling bond along the ͓111͔ direction.…”
Section: Impact Of Mechanical Stress On Direct and Trap-assisted Gatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stress-induced change in the total interface charge may arise if the activation energy of interface charge traps depends on stress [27], and will correspond to a change in the surface Fermi energy E F s . Via the requirement for charge neutrality this changes the width (W ) of the surface depletion layer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted activation energy E a of the compressive-strained device (angle from linear fit at Arrhenius plot of device) is 0.06 eV. However, this value is lower than that of the control device (E a = 0.30 eV) because the Si-H or Si−SiO 2 interface dangling bonds are distorted by the mechanical stress, resulting in E a lowering [14]. By the high-pressure D annealing, E a of the control device is decreased to 0.13 eV, but the compressivestrained device has increased E a to about 0.28 eV.…”
Section: Characterization Of Annealing Effectmentioning
confidence: 84%