2017
DOI: 10.4186/ej.2017.21.7.157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hot Press Joining Optimization of Polyethylene to Aluminium Alloy AA6061-T6 Lap Joint Using Design of Experiments

Abstract: Abstract. The hot press method is used to join a poly-ethylene plate of thickness 4 mm with an aluminium alloy AA6061-T6 plate of thickness 1.5 mm. A preanodizing process is crucial for the success of such joint. The anodizing was performed under a current density of 200 A/m 2 , temperature 24°C, sulphuric acid 5 wt. % and for a 60 minutes. Three period parameters were considered in the hot pressing process; temperature: 115 and 135°C, pressure: 2, 6, and 10 bar and pressing time: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 minutes. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pure HDPE tensile strength presents a higher value than any other result found in previous studies for Al/HDPE composites [18][19][20] . Those results suggest that even in a predominantly cohesive failure, as occurred in sample 3, the maximum stress applied to separate PE from aluminum is still smaller than the resistance to rupture the organic area of the polymer alone.…”
Section: Mechanical Evaluationcontrasting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The pure HDPE tensile strength presents a higher value than any other result found in previous studies for Al/HDPE composites [18][19][20] . Those results suggest that even in a predominantly cohesive failure, as occurred in sample 3, the maximum stress applied to separate PE from aluminum is still smaller than the resistance to rupture the organic area of the polymer alone.…”
Section: Mechanical Evaluationcontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…The multiple image analyses and failure areas met the tensile strength results of Table 2, once the different samples with different mechanical results and percentage of failures converge to identical contributions to cohesive and adhesive failures. Besides, for the result obtained using the new method, some PE and aluminum composite references and tests showed a great variability of results in the adhesion tests performed according to previous methods 18,19 . The numbers obtained depend on several factors, but it is important to correlate the failure areas ( Figure 6) with maximum loads to define where the weak point in the structural composite is.…”
Section: Mechanical Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Adhesive bonding may be performed by secondary bonding, involving the usage of adhesives between the parts [ 49 , 50 ], or by co-curing, where the matrix of the composite is cured in contact with the desired adherend and, hence, cure and bonding happen simultaneously. For thermosets, the co-cure has to be performed during the cure of the second adherend, be it another composite [ 45 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 ] or a metal [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. Kim et al [ 51 ] evidenced the superior failure strength of co-cured joints without adhesive for carbon/epoxy laminates compared to those with adhesive or secondary bonding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%