2016
DOI: 10.1080/0734578x.2016.1250199
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Household ceramic diversity in the late prehistory of the Appalachian Summit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Feature 112 is a circular pit nearly 2 meters in diameter and 80 centimeters deep (Figure 4). It was unusual both for its extraordinary quantity of hickory nuts and for its unique assemblage of Pisgah pottery, a style of pottery typical of the Pisgah phase located in the Appalachian Summit to the west and northwest of Joara (Dickens, 1976; Keel, 1976; Ward and Davis, 1999; Whyte, 2017). Sherds from at least eight Pisgah‐series cooking jars were recovered from Feature 112, composing 36.8% of the feature's ceramic assemblage; compare this to the overall Berry site ceramic assemblage, which is attributable principally to the Burke series and Burke phase, with less than 1% of pottery attributable to the Pisgah phase (Figure 5; Beck and Moore, 2002; Moore et al., 2016, 359–60).…”
Section: Native Women and Symbolic Powermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature 112 is a circular pit nearly 2 meters in diameter and 80 centimeters deep (Figure 4). It was unusual both for its extraordinary quantity of hickory nuts and for its unique assemblage of Pisgah pottery, a style of pottery typical of the Pisgah phase located in the Appalachian Summit to the west and northwest of Joara (Dickens, 1976; Keel, 1976; Ward and Davis, 1999; Whyte, 2017). Sherds from at least eight Pisgah‐series cooking jars were recovered from Feature 112, composing 36.8% of the feature's ceramic assemblage; compare this to the overall Berry site ceramic assemblage, which is attributable principally to the Burke series and Burke phase, with less than 1% of pottery attributable to the Pisgah phase (Figure 5; Beck and Moore, 2002; Moore et al., 2016, 359–60).…”
Section: Native Women and Symbolic Powermentioning
confidence: 99%