2021
DOI: 10.1177/1354068821990298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How and why party position estimates from manifestos, expert, and party elite surveys diverge: A comparative analysis of the ‘left–right’ and the ‘European integration’ dimensions

Abstract: This paper examines the validity of three approaches to estimate party positions on the general left–right and EU dimensions. We newly introduce party elite data from the comprehensive IntUne survey and cross-validate it with existing expert survey and manifesto data. The general left–right estimates generated by elites and experts show a higher congruence than those derived from party manifestos; neither measure clearly materializes as more valid regarding EU positions. We identify which factors explain diver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as is typical in studies of this type, our interest is precisely to read the government's policy position from a corpus consisting of its own statements. This is consistent with studies that analyze political texts from unilateral sources such as party manifestos (Eder et al, 2017), party elite interviews (Ecker et al, 2022), and public pronouncements or speeches by key political actors such as chief executives (Kaufman, 2020;Panao and Pernia, 2022).…”
Section: Data Variables and Analytical Approachsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…However, as is typical in studies of this type, our interest is precisely to read the government's policy position from a corpus consisting of its own statements. This is consistent with studies that analyze political texts from unilateral sources such as party manifestos (Eder et al, 2017), party elite interviews (Ecker et al, 2022), and public pronouncements or speeches by key political actors such as chief executives (Kaufman, 2020;Panao and Pernia, 2022).…”
Section: Data Variables and Analytical Approachsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Second, our analysis is based on the measurement of party positions via party manifestos. These are, however, not without coding issues and pitfalls (Ecker et al, 2022). For instance, promises in manifestos may differ from implemented policies and hide true party preferences, as parties carefully consider what image they want to evoke.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, a recent cross-validation of party positioning comparing CHES-Europe, party elite, and manifesto surveys suggests that “expert data provide more valid estimates on the left–right dimension” and that estimates from expert and elite surveys “show a higher congruence than those derived from party manifestos” (Ecker et al, 2021: 10).…”
Section: Ches-latin America Reliability and Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%