2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327825mcs0704_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Campus Media Cover Sports: The Gender-Equity Issue, One Generation Later

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Publishing far fewer stories and photographs of women than men potentially increases the power of both 'presence and absence' or who is featured and who is ignored by the sports media (Entman, 1993;Huffman, et al, 2004). On TVNZ, women were virtually ignored in top story selections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Publishing far fewer stories and photographs of women than men potentially increases the power of both 'presence and absence' or who is featured and who is ignored by the sports media (Entman, 1993;Huffman, et al, 2004). On TVNZ, women were virtually ignored in top story selections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have observed that when female athletes and women's sports are covered, the coverage is similar to that of male athletes and male sports (Huffman, Tuggle, & Rosengard, 2004) and that women's consumption of sport through social media is growing (Schultz & Sheffer, 2011). Social media also represent an avenue for female athletes and women's sports leagues to promote their own agendas and connect with audiences without needing mainstream media resources as a conduit.…”
Section: Women In Sportsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an examination of campus newspapers, Wann (1998) illustrated the challenge facing female athletes when demonstrating that women received significantly less coverage than men when in direct comparison with NCAA athletic participation rates and coinciding university enrollment rates. Further, in a similar investigation, Huffman et al (2004) echoed similar concerns when reporting that women received only 27.3% of the coverage in campus newspaper publications.…”
Section: Overall Gender Coveragementioning
confidence: 71%
“…The current investigation of USA Today expands literature on gender coverage allocated in sport media outlets (Cunningham & Sagas, 2002;Cunningham et al, 2004;Kane, 1988;Pedersen, 2002). While the extent of inequities have varied, the underlying trend in past content analysis research is that women are significantly underrepresented in sport-related publications when in comparison with men (Eagleman, Pedersen, & Wharton, 2009;Fink & Kensicki, 2002;Huffman, Tuggle, & Rosengard, 2004). Further, in addition to illustrating the overall gender coverage allocations (Bryant, 1980, Miller, 1975Urquhart & Crossman, 1999), scholars have also outlined the unique gender inequities facing female athletes when focusing on the coverage afforded to men's and women's similar sport teams (Cooper, 2008;Cunningham & Sagas, 2002).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 90%