2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2016.10.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do ICP variants perform when used for scan matching terrain point clouds?

Abstract: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.How do ICP variants perform when used for scan matc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(49 reference statements)
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ICP method generates a correspondence between points and finds the rotation and translation that minimizes the distance between all correspondences. This research is extended to generate a correspondence between lines and faces [24], [25]; improved studies with many different versions exist [26]. NDT divides the standard point cloud into equal cell sizes and calculates the normal distribution.…”
Section: B Estimation Of the Relative Pose Scan-matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICP method generates a correspondence between points and finds the rotation and translation that minimizes the distance between all correspondences. This research is extended to generate a correspondence between lines and faces [24], [25]; improved studies with many different versions exist [26]. NDT divides the standard point cloud into equal cell sizes and calculates the normal distribution.…”
Section: B Estimation Of the Relative Pose Scan-matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a comprehensive breakdown of the ICP process, readers should refer to the work of Rusinkiewicz and Leroy [15]. For further reading on the practical application of ICP, the works of Pomerleau et al [16] and Donoso et al [17] are good starting points.…”
Section: Point Cloud Registration With Iterative Closest Pointmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ze-Su et al [35] believe this would represent two O(n) searches: one for the translation estimation, and one for the orientation estimation. This approach is found to be more precise and eicient than ICP in the given examples [35], although given the variation in performance of algorithms in scenes [12] this result may not be generalisable. As demonstrated by Ze-Su et al, the method is applied to identify two complete sets of data, rather than mapping a subset of the data (the area visible around the robot) into the full set of data (the full map); further adaptation may therefore be required for the method to function for general indoor localisation.…”
Section: Existing Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of line-of-sight indoor localisation was irst resolved through the matching of cloud point data (obtained from a line-ofsight sensor such as a Li-Dar) to retrieve tuple (x, y, θ ) describing the location and orientation of a robot in a known environment. This was irst achieved by algorithms such as the Iterative Closest Point (ICP) algorithm Besl and McKay [4], and a long line of alternative heuristic algorithms Lu and Milios [23], Diosi and Kleeman [11] [29], Biber and Strasser [5], Donoso-Aguirre et al [13], Konecny et al [19] and various improvements on the ICP's convergence speed [12] [32], dataset optimisation [33] [25] or precision metrics [14]. Performing indoor localisation without a priori knowledge of the robot's pose increases the diiculty to this problem, as a global search for the position must now be performed, rather than simply a pose reinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%