Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education 2019
DOI: 10.1145/3287324.3287405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Many Abilities Can We Measure in Computational Thinking?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on CSTA and ISTE's (2011) operational definition, Chen et al (2017) proposed a five-component framework (syntax, data, algorithms, representing, and efficient and effective) to guide their development of the assessment items in two types of CT applications: coding in robotics and reasoning for everyday events. A recent study (Araujo et al, 2019) aimed to verify Selby and Woollard's (2013) five-process-element framework (decomposition, abstraction, algorithmic thinking, evaluation and generalization) using the data collected from the Bebras Challenge contest, which is a popular international contest with multiplechoice questions regarding problem solving in daily-life contexts (i.e., domaingeneral tasks). In sum, the above studies have assessed CT using performance tasks or tests in which it is regarded as thinking outcomes (both domain-general and domain-specific) and thinking processes (domain-general).…”
Section: Assessment Tools Of Ct: Outcomes Versus Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on CSTA and ISTE's (2011) operational definition, Chen et al (2017) proposed a five-component framework (syntax, data, algorithms, representing, and efficient and effective) to guide their development of the assessment items in two types of CT applications: coding in robotics and reasoning for everyday events. A recent study (Araujo et al, 2019) aimed to verify Selby and Woollard's (2013) five-process-element framework (decomposition, abstraction, algorithmic thinking, evaluation and generalization) using the data collected from the Bebras Challenge contest, which is a popular international contest with multiplechoice questions regarding problem solving in daily-life contexts (i.e., domaingeneral tasks). In sum, the above studies have assessed CT using performance tasks or tests in which it is regarded as thinking outcomes (both domain-general and domain-specific) and thinking processes (domain-general).…”
Section: Assessment Tools Of Ct: Outcomes Versus Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Araujo et al [2] modelo de PC que engloba habilidades e competências, desenvolvido através de uma combinação de dados empíricos, análise do estado da arte no PC e elementos de avaliação cognitiva. Neste modelo, PC é uma abordagem para resolver problemas e envolve quatro competências e doze habilidades.…”
Section: Framework Teóricos De Pensamento Computacionalunclassified
“…The questions of the Bebras Challenge are related to CT skills, but the participants do not need programming knowledge to answer the test Dagiene et al (2017). Several initiatives have applied the Bebras to measure CT skills in different contexts Araujo et al (2019Araujo et al ( , 2017; Chiazzese et al (2018); Palts and Pedaste (2017).…”
Section: Bebras Challengementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is no CT formal definition and reports on how to integrate it into High School subjects. Studies are still exploring the processes, tools, and evaluation instruments to enable effective adoption (Alexander et al, 2010;Araujo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%