2004
DOI: 10.1126/science.303.5660.955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much at Risk Are Cone Snails?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In their dialogue in Science Chivian et al (2003; 2004) raised important concerns about the quantity of cone snails taken from the wild, indicating that thousands were then collected to satisfy research demands [55] , [56] . This was forcefully rebutted by Duda et al (2004) who reviewed recent conotoxin research from which they determined that a maximum of 20 research groups were working on Conus toxins at that time, and that any single characterisation required fewer than 21 animals to be sacrificed [57] . Regardless of where the true determinant lies, balancing the legitimate needs of medical research without further compromising natural resources is essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their dialogue in Science Chivian et al (2003; 2004) raised important concerns about the quantity of cone snails taken from the wild, indicating that thousands were then collected to satisfy research demands [55] , [56] . This was forcefully rebutted by Duda et al (2004) who reviewed recent conotoxin research from which they determined that a maximum of 20 research groups were working on Conus toxins at that time, and that any single characterisation required fewer than 21 animals to be sacrificed [57] . Regardless of where the true determinant lies, balancing the legitimate needs of medical research without further compromising natural resources is essential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem is compounded by concerns regarding depletion of the limited marine resource via bioprospecting (see Chivian et al, 2003 and Duda et al, 2004). To offset these concerns, combined efforts encompassing genomic and proteomic approaches have both increased the diversity of conopeptide sequences and minimized animal usage (Galyer et al 2005, Livett et al, 2006, Jakubowski et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rapid peptide profiling may be useful in monitoring both intra‐species and inter‐species variation in venom components. The methods described in this article are readily applicable to the venom samples collected from a single snail, thus obviating the need for a large collection of snails 49–51…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%