SOFSEM 2008: Theory and Practice of Computer Science
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-77566-9_21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Information about the Future Is Needed?

Abstract: We propose a new way of characterizing the complexity of online problems. Instead of measuring the degradation of output quality caused by the ignorance of the future we choose to quantify the amount of additional global information needed for an online algorithm to solve the problem optimally. In our model, the algorithm cooperates with an oracle that can see the whole input. We define the advice complexity of the problem to be the minimal number of bits (normalized per input request, and minimized over all a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The advice complexity of online problems was first introduced by Dobrev, Královič and Pardubská in 2008 [4]. In their work, they used a different model.…”
Section: Online Algorithms |mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The advice complexity of online problems was first introduced by Dobrev, Královič and Pardubská in 2008 [4]. In their work, they used a different model.…”
Section: Online Algorithms |mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a setting, merely one bit of advice suffices to achieve a competitive ratio of 4 3 : The oracle indicates whether there is a 2 3 -large job or not. The algorithm then works like the one described in the proof of Theorem 3.1, but recognizes the 2 3 -large job on its own without reading any index from the advice tape.…”
Section: Constant Number Of Advice Bitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In 2008, Dobrev, Královič, and Pardubská introduced the concept of advice complexity for online problems [5]. Basically, they asked the question we asked at the beginning of this chapter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%