2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much of the corporate bond spread is due to personal taxes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Green and Ødegaard (1997) and Liu et al (2007) present evidence that taxes did not have a significant impact on Treasury bond prices in the post-1986 period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Green and Ødegaard (1997) and Liu et al (2007) present evidence that taxes did not have a significant impact on Treasury bond prices in the post-1986 period.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…McCallum (1973) shows that the announcement of the introduction of a capital gains tax in Canada raised bond yields, as would be expected if taxes are capitalized in bond prices. In contrast, using Canadian data for 1964-1976, Brennan and Schwartz (1979 Elton et al (2001), while Liu et al (2007) find that taxes have only a small impact on US corporate bond returns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, a net long-term loss from the highest tax rate group is used first to reduce gain from the next-highest tax rate group and then to reduce gain from a lower tax rate group. 6 A similar assumption is made in Elton et al (2001) and Liu et al (2007). 7 We assume a = 0.5 later in empirical investigation.…”
Section: Structural Models With Exogenous Leveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elton et al (2001) show that taxes can significantly affect bond prices. Liu et al (2007) incorporate personal taxes into the standard reduced-form models. Liu et al (2006) extend the Leland-Toft (1996) model to incorporate personal taxes on equity and debt in the structural model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%