2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structural models of corporate bond pricing with personal taxes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are robust to different periods analyzed and different definitions of leverage and estimations of volatility. Possible explanations of the Merton (1974) model failures could be related to the difficulties in estimating the underlying variables, such as volatility, corporate value or market value of debt (see Huang and Huang, 2003), liquidity and tax asymmetries (Chen et al, 2007b;Longstaff et al, 2005;Helwege et al, 2013;Qi et al, 2010) and to model assumptions regarding default and loss given default (Black and Cox, 1976;Leland, 1994;Leland and Toft, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our findings are robust to different periods analyzed and different definitions of leverage and estimations of volatility. Possible explanations of the Merton (1974) model failures could be related to the difficulties in estimating the underlying variables, such as volatility, corporate value or market value of debt (see Huang and Huang, 2003), liquidity and tax asymmetries (Chen et al, 2007b;Longstaff et al, 2005;Helwege et al, 2013;Qi et al, 2010) and to model assumptions regarding default and loss given default (Black and Cox, 1976;Leland, 1994;Leland and Toft, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since corporate bond investors must pay both state and local tax on coupon income, bonds with a higher coupon rate will be charged more tax than those with a lower coupon rate. Hence, bonds with a higher coupon will be less attractive to investors, and may require a higher premium (Qi et al, 2010). However, empirical results of previous studies indicate that coupon rate may have other effects on bond yield spreads, such as liquidity, and/or upward-sloping spot rate term structure.…”
Section: Bond Yield Spreads and Other Well-known Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, Liu et al (2006) identifies a sizable tax effect on bond yield spreads by extending the Leland and Toft (1996) model. Using both rating-based calibration and maximum likelihood estimation, Qi et al (2010) show that the spread prediction ability of structural credit models improves considerably when personal tax is taken into account in most major structural credit models.…”
Section: Tax Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it contributes to the vast literature examining the factors that affect bond credit spreads. Recent studies explore the effect of bond and firm characteristics on bond credit spreads, such as leverage (Collin-Dufresne, Goldstein, and Martin 2001), taxes (Elton et al 2001;Qi, Liu, and Wu 2010), equity volatility (Campbell and Taksler 2003), liquidity (Chen, Lesmond, and Wei 2007;Dick-Nielsen, Feldhütter, and Lando 2012), and supplier's information flow (Chen et al 2013). My article provides the first direct link between product market competition and bond yield spreads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%