2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much should society fuel the greed of innovators?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 301 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
37
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, this view seems to rest on the core idea that innovation protection mechanisms, which can be enforced by large and well established firms, are effective in fostering innovation. However, innovation protection mechanisms is a much disputed theme on which traditional neoclassical views are challenged by the evolutionarist view [10], so that no assumption is made in the present paper as to how appropriability conditions work in the financial sector.…”
Section: Persistence Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In sum, this view seems to rest on the core idea that innovation protection mechanisms, which can be enforced by large and well established firms, are effective in fostering innovation. However, innovation protection mechanisms is a much disputed theme on which traditional neoclassical views are challenged by the evolutionarist view [10], so that no assumption is made in the present paper as to how appropriability conditions work in the financial sector.…”
Section: Persistence Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, using patents as an innovation measure may be problematic too, as the link between patents and innovation outputs is still unclear. Roper et al [12] argue that patent activity and firms' innovation are only weakly related, whilst Dosi et al [10] point out that the relationship between patents and innovation tends to differ between sectors and depends on industry-specific knowledge basis. Furthermore, patents may be registered on an irregular basis by the Patent Offices, which may not reflect the periodicity of firms' decision to patent: this would heavily affect outcomes if persistence is to be analyzed [11].…”
Section: Persistence Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is particularly pertinent to Web technology -a fast paced software industry where inventions can be rendered obsolete before a patent is granted (Orsenigo & Sterzi, 2010). Moreover, by preventing imitation, patents inhibit sequential and complementary inventions that utilize an existing piece of software (Dosi et al, 2006). This hampers aggregate information production and puts patenting at odds with the open innovation practices that are valued in software development (Benkler, 2002;Von Hippel, 2005).…”
Section: Patents As Signals Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The boom in Web and Internet-related companies during the 1990s occurred against a backdrop of significant reforms in the US patent system, which was being extended into software and business methods (Wagner & Cockburn, 2010). There was also the "NASDAQ regulation (1984) which allowed market entry and listing of firms operating at a deficit on the condition that they had considerable intangible capital composed of IPR [intellectual property rights]" (Dosi et al, 2006). Such regulations enabled IPR requirements to lower the standards for market entry, precipitating a wave of financially under-performing firms on the NASDAQ during the 1990s (Klein & Mohanram, 2004).…”
Section: Patents As Signals Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dosi et al [24] analyzed the relations between appropriability, opportunities and rates of innovation. The evidence from the study suggested that IPRs were not a very important mechanism for breeding firms to earn profits from their innovation.…”
Section: Review Of Empirical Studies On the Relationship Between Iprsmentioning
confidence: 99%