2016
DOI: 10.1162/asep_a_00461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Restrictive Are ASEAN's Rules of Origin?

Abstract: This paper uses a product-level gravity approach to estimate the effect of ASEAN's product-specific rules of origin (ROOs) on regional trade, using original data on rules applicable at the six-digit level of the harmonized system. We find that the average tariff ad valorem equivalent (AVE) of ASEAN's ROOs is 3.40 percent across all instruments and sectors. The trade-weighted average is 2.09 percent. This moderate estimate is in line with the existing literature. We also find fairly high AVEs for some sectors, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As Cadot and Ing, (p. 2) argue, RoO ‘constrain the sourcing choices of multinational firms along regional patterns dictated by [the PTA], whereas GVC optimization may call for different choices’. In other words, firms may have different preferences on RoO provisions in PTAs depending on the organization of their value chain.…”
Section: Global Value Chains and Firm Preferences Over Pta Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Cadot and Ing, (p. 2) argue, RoO ‘constrain the sourcing choices of multinational firms along regional patterns dictated by [the PTA], whereas GVC optimization may call for different choices’. In other words, firms may have different preferences on RoO provisions in PTAs depending on the organization of their value chain.…”
Section: Global Value Chains and Firm Preferences Over Pta Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantifying the potential benefits of applying such simplified RoO in the context of the CFTA would help to limit the extent to which RoO will act as NTMs and thus reduce the benefits for intra-regional trade. Techniques to undertake such analysis have been developed -e.g., Cadot and Ing (2016) -but have to our knowledge yet to be applied to African contexts.…”
Section: Rules Of Originmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… See Latrille and Lee (2012) for a discussion of RoO for services in a large number of trade agreements.19 This can be based on whether a minimum amount value added is embodied in a product as the result of activities in the last country in which the product was processed/produced according to different calculation techniques; whether a maximum percentage of non-originating materials has not been exceeded; or a minimum percentage of originating inputs has been used in the manufacturing of the finished product.20 Recent examples of non-Africa research includeCadot and Ing (2016) andConconi et al (2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estevadeordal and Suominen (2008) found that restrictive RoO in final goods encourage trade in intra-PTA inputs and diversion from extra-PTA sources of intermediates. More recently, Cadot and Ing (2016) found that ad valorem equivalents of ASEAN RoO are significant and that some rules appear particularly restrictive in the textile and apparel, footwear, prepared food and automobile sectors. 20 They argued that this hampers the development of GVCs and that those sectors could benefit from simplification of RoO.…”
Section: Box 2 Types Of Substantial Transformation Criterion In Roomentioning
confidence: 99%